Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: contemporary art
-
MAGNUS PETERSON HORNER
at Gaylord Fine ArtsOn the top floor of The Gaylord Apartments, a spare selection of seven new paintings by Magnus Peterson Horner tingles the optic and haptic senses, even when they’re barely paintings, even when they’re barely there at all.
Horner paints people as if sensed through eyes hardly cleared of amniotic fluid: a vision that’s fuzzy and faint, but still so raw that we barely know what to do with it.
Portrait of a Young Boy and Head of a Young Boy (all works 2025) show broken perceptions, so decomposed that the impression of a personal presence takes several seconds to emerge. Each ekes out a minimum of differentiation between figure and ground, so that the surface and the painted skin do not really split, remaining interpermeated.
From there on, every surface looks like sensitive skin. Gazing at these surfaces leads to an uncomfortable vicarious feeling, a sense that we—the viewers—suffer from the same sensitive skin condition suggested by the paintings’ odd texture. Bust of a Woman bears a broken fragment of torso, the sense of exposure heightened by the texture of the figure, which the painter deforms with a puckering or blistering technique. Other likenesses are smeared with photo developer, a chemical foreign to the medium. It curdles the paint and quite literally makes the represented skin crawl, impeding the viewer’s reading of the limited tracings that emerge.
Installation view, Magnus Peterson Horner, 2025. Courtesy of Gaylord Fine Arts. Even more friction comes from the angle of representation itself: if this is portraiture, it’s rethought from such a distant starting point that a first walk through the exhibition might permit little more than a marvel at the scattered strangeness of the artist’s imagination. One untitled painting consists of only a mesh cloth stretched on a wooden armature. In another, around the corner, Kraft singles set behind picture glass create an imperfect checkerboard pattern. It’s unclear whether Horner foresaw how the cheese would mold or planned the squares’ decomposition, which is proceeding in an orderly right-to-left direction.
And yet ghosts of association among these incompatible objects somehow float back in. These affinities are not so much narrative as primitively sensory, charged with reflexes rather than stories: the mold recast as a complexion’s floral outbreak, the mesh charged with an aura of cheesecloth wringing liquid from a lump of organic matter. The grid of threads hints at a kind of straining but doesn’t perform it, making present just the sensitivity, the foretaste of sensation.
While staring into the checkerboard’s edge, fraying greenish, I thought of Harmony Korine’s 1997 movie Gummo. Why? Horner’s paintings don’t shock; nothing resembles the explicit abuse and cat killing for which Gummo is notorious. Perhaps the framed cheese reminded me of a stray detail from the movie: a strip of bacon taped to bathroom tile behind the boy-narrator, Solomon, as he eats dinner in the tub. But I don’t think the connection is superficial. Horner’s persistent subject, oftentimes just glimpsed through fits and starts, is the same excruciating exposure of childhood that Korine’s film pushed to an extreme.
Portrait of a Young Boy, 2025. To be clear, it’s Solomon, not Korine, that Horner resembles. His paintings evidence a certain distinctive imagination, unpredictable and frank, which resonates as a generational sensibility. In a past exhibition at the Queens gallery Gandt, for example, Horner showed a painting of a still from a game of Fortnite played by a boy he babysat. But the impression of the virtual world was so defamiliarized that it could only have been found by eyes completely foreign to the game, or ones so glued to it that any ordinary familiarity had melted away.
If it’s true that Horner’s mind was embedded formatively in a deep matrix of media, in these new paintings he seems to have come out the other side. Nothing digital is present, except perhaps as a sort of afterburn that washes out a painting like Head of a Young Boy, which might show how a sunlit face appears to immoderately online eyes. Horner paints not the liquid crystal screen, but the effect that it produces. The viewing angle of Girl with a Kitten, stuck at an odd angle of fixation, could similarly be read as an aftereffect of POV inundation, but only if you go out on a limb. These symptoms aren’t specific to any technology in particular. The congenitally fuzzy gaze they bespeak feels more general, or even, again, generational.
This persistent sense of disorientation is a strength, and it’s heightened by a confident restraint in curation. I was told by the Gaylord gallerists that a good chunk of the works Horner brought from New York were, upon deliberation, tucked out of sight. I’d have loved to see them, but their absence only adds to the square-one charge. The same goes for the press release: there wasn’t one. Rigorous subtraction fuels the fantasy of new eyes, or newly perceptive ones, concentrating focus on the acute sensation of what survives the paring-down. Here, realized in sparse gestures, it’s a world almost painfully lush.
-
COLLECTOR’S CORNER — (print exclusive)
Jordan D. SchnitzerArtillery recently sat down with art collector and philanthropist Jordan D. Schnitzer during the opening of The Schnitzer Family Foundation’s “The Art of Food” exhibition currently on view at the Long Beach Museum of Art.
Why Art?
How do we deal in a world where we are constantly being told where to go, what to buy, and who to listen to, and then plied with misinformation? How do we maintain our rights to freedom of speech and thought? I would suggest the two bastions where no one can tell you what’s right or wrong are art and nature.This article is available in print and in our digital edition. To read the full article, please subscribe.
-
AN ARTIST ANSWERS QUESTIONS
Pedro PedroTop three dead artists?
Fernando Botero, Wayne Thiebaud, and Henri Matisse.
This article is available in print and in our digital edition. To read the full article, please subscribe.
-
Sandra Cinto
The delicate line-work in these semi-abstract sea/land/sky-scapes is incredibly controlled, almost to a fault. It doesn’t leave much room for the unexpected. This might be okay except that the overall vocabulary of forms is a bit too constrained. For instance, the squiggly undulating seas, asterisk-like stars, and meandering triangular lattice-works all start to feel schematic—like well-practiced versions of familiar forms. The glitzy gold backgrounds and matte neutral tones split the difference between tasteful and ostentatious, but do not land anywhere particularly original.
Sandra Cinto: Prelude to the Sun
Tanya Bonakdar
1010 N. Highland Ave.,
Los Angeles, CA 90038
On view through July 2, 2025 -
Paul Mpagi Sepuya
at VielmetterThe title “positioner” refers to the photographer’s inclusion of himself in several of these photos as he positions his models, most of which are queer men and women. These are a reflection on studio portraiture as a specific social context. They explore the relationship of photographer to model, not just on an interpersonal level, but as it reverberates within the context of the studio and the artist’s practice. The content is not intimacy, per se, but the care, communication, and technique that go into capturing it. These are continually rewarding on conceptual, formal, and psychological levels, which reveal how all of the above are also intertwined.
Paul Mpagi Sepuya: POSITIONER
Vielmetter Los Angeles
1700 S. Santa Fe Ave., #101
Los Angeles, CA 90021
On view through July 19, 2025 -
Jill Magid
at Various Small FiresThe centerpiece of this show is a carpeted wooden platform, covered with white on blue stars like an American flag. Various Small Fires’ owner, Esther Kim Varet, is running for Congress, and this mini-stage is meant for use by her campaign. What Varet and artist Jill Magid offer is a call to action—something which most political art fatally lacks. This is a welcome corrective to art that thinks making a political statement counts as doing politics. There are also twenty heart sculptures, cast in grey cement, in the atrium, suggesting the heart it takes to get involved. A third piece, which includes the official forms for declaring oneself as a congressional candidate, underscores this point. 50/50 stars.
Jill Magid: Heart of a Citizen
Various Small Fires
812 N. Highland Ave.,
Los Angeles, CA 90038
On view through June 28, 2025 -
Mary Weatherford
at David Kordansky GalleryTwo big rooms of Mary Weatherford’s prodigious wall works still aren’t enough space to contain the mesmerizing views the artist generously presents in “The Surrealist” exhibition, which is a bold, seductive reminder of painting’s emotional power and material possibilities. Neon tubes, starfish, and coral press against luminous, amorphous, and almost galactic color fields in works that range from the intimate to the monumental. The artist’s deep commitment to pigment gives the surfaces a glowing, almost bodily presence. Her best paintings here—typically the largest—are both dreamy and visceral, undulating between clarity and mystery without fail. The show feels like an artist in full command of her language, unfolding history, memory, and matter into art that is formally elegant, unapologetically personal, and very much alive.
Mary Weatherford: The Surrealist
David Kordansky Gallery
5130 W. Edgewood Pl.,
Los Angeles, CA 90019
On view through June 28th, 2025 -
Luis C. Garza
at the Los Angeles Central LibrarySelf-taught photographer Luis Garza began his career as a photojournalist documenting the turbulent social events of the 60s for La Raza magazine, which was a counter-balance to the prevailing conservative and often racist media narratives. His latest exhibit of 63 silver gelatin print photographs features images documenting the Chicano photographer’s East Los Angeles community, his South Bronx neighborhood, and his 1971 travels to Budapest, Hungary, where he met Mexican muralist and social realist, David Alfaro Siqueiros. It’s a wide-ranging, international, and bi-coastal perspective—a fraught and often violent socio-political microcosm of Los Angeles and East Coast histories, but there are also poignant images of “everyman” as resolute figures.
Curator Armando Durón has cleverly organized the photographs in pairs, ostensibly to provoke dialogue between each other and with the viewer. One such duo is an image of Siqueiros matched with director and playwright Luis Valdez, founder of the storied El Teatro Campesino (The Farm Workers’ Theater)—a witty pairing of two cultural giants. Each figure is animated, hands pointed, signifying an existential way forward. But some solo pictures are singularly emotive, such as a pensive portrait of the legendary Cesar Chávez (1974) or the coquettish Say Girl! (1974) which pictures a Black woman in her flirty element. In the same way documentary photographer Susan Meiselas centered on unexpected New York scenes, and Dennis Feldman focused on Hollywood street life, Garza was intent on capturing both the profound and the everyday—but those distinctions are elusive at best. Some compositions are stronger than others, but the net impact is noteworthy. The exhibit is a very small slice of Garza’s prolific output; his archive contains more than 8,000 images, a substantial body of work yet to be revealed.
The Other Side of Memory: Photographs by Luis C. Garza
Los Angeles Central Library
On view through July 13, 2025 -
Tony Cokes
at Hannah HoffmanTo get to Tony Cokes’ “All About Evil” at Hannah Hoffman, a show displaying 12 selected works from a period of nearly two decades (2006-2022), one must pass a sidewalk sign for the neighboring jewelry boutique Spinelli Kilcollin. Cokes’ HD videos feature large white Sans Serif text against bright, embarrassingly and overwhelmingly American colors: red, white, and blue. Performing a patriotic zeal gone awry, the works pull the viewer in multiple directions at once: Device 1, a window flat screen, faces into the private, gated, courtyard, (where one must be buzzed in to view the work); Device 2, a wall-mounted flat screen, features two headsets for a pair of viewers to place over their ears, while a different song plays aloud from Device 3, an LED screen placed to the right of the small gallery space. The conditions surrounding this viewing experience are at odds with the overtly political content of Cokes’ work, which uses, for instance, the Sesame Street theme song alongside text on the response to coronavirus and the larger failures of the American political and educational systems. Stark text both confronts and entertains the viewer, who is offered a chance to sit on one of three large foam square blocks in the center of the gallery. Cokes’ provocative work reproduces a space not unlike an electronics superstore. The show offers neither space for immersion in a single work nor a path to political resistance. Instead, its success lies in the suggestion that rebellion itself has become a commodity, presented on multiple flashing screens with two soundtracks playing at once. The viewer is divided from themself, much like the user of an iPhone or Instagram.
-
MEGHANN STEPHENSON
at Half GalleryDario Argento’s 1977 film Suspiria left a lasting impression on me. It’s moments of indiscernibility, of looming disquiet, of eyes flashing against a blackened screen have stuck with me long since first watch. It’s an exhilarating study of the ominous, of unease, of femininity, and the complexities between, all of which are at the heart of Meghann Stephenson’s show “I’ll Be Your Mirror.” The seven oil paintings in the show are done in flat, muted neutrals and center around a woman set against a deep black background. Devoid of detail, the vacant backgrounds enable us to build a scene around the character and create our own fantastical stories from the moments Stephenson reveals.
In A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing, the woman (who bears a resemblance to Stephenson) is slightly reclined, wrapped in a brown fur pulled tight against her throat, her hair tucked under the collar so not a glimpse of flesh is seen. Eyes squinting off to the left, she appears guarded against a looming threat. The quiet unease, the feeling of impending menace, isn’t limited to the external but emanates from the central figure herself. Her gaze, while wary, is unwavering as if tempting conflict. In I’ll Be Your Mirror, she and her she and her doppelganger, dressed in matching pink nightgowns, stare down the viewer with unwavering gazes that tease of unrevealed secrets. Behind them is a mirror in which one of them is reflected, back to us as if to defy scrutiny or legibility.
The work’s pared-down details can be understood as an omission; the figure reflective of a carefully crafted persona that threatens to break at any moment. Stephenson succeeds in illustrating the haunting experience of living within a fractured self.
Meghann Stephenson: I’ll Be Your Mirror
Half Gallery
By appointment only -
SELINE BURN
at Baert Gallery“Kairos” by Seline Burn at Baert Gallery features 10 large oil paintings on canvas and linen, all completed this year. Blues, yellows, and greens render female figures across landscapes and interior settings that blur the boundaries between inner and outer, self and other, human and avian, dream state and waking life. In North Star, a reclining woman’s breath takes the shape of a bird; in Ariadne’s Thread (2025), three nude women with feathered skin walk across a log bridge, connected by a rope suspended in their hands. In the smaller room of the two-room gallery, two complementary paintings would seem to drive us out of the mythical dreamscape into the reality of nature, with its consuming people and animals (a cat traps a bird, a large pretzel bears bite marks). My favorite piece in this show is Intertwined, which depicts two women, or two images of the same woman, lying beside one another, separated by a striped straw hat and by the fact that one wears a striped blue shirt while the other rests bare-chested. Lying in mirrored poses, their identical brown hair flows into one another as if shared strands. There is a decided absence of male figures in these paintings, unless Gargoyles and knives suffice.
Seline Burn: Kairos
Baert Gallery
1923 S. Santa Fe Ave.,
Los Angeles, CA 90021
On view through June 7, 2025 -
FRED LONIDIER
at Michael BeneventoWhen I look at Fred Lonidier’s show “Vacation Village Trade Show,” at Michael Benevento, my mind naturally goes to Antonioni’s Blow Up (1966). Much like Antonioni, whose film is about a photographer who inadvertently captures a murder, Lonidier is interested in the camera, and by extension the photographer, as a knowing entity, both a clarifier and obscurer of reality.
In “Vacation Village Trade Show,” Lonidier presents a sparse display of film strips paired with text. Scrawled on beige paper that sandwiches the images, the text above reads “What is your relation to these images,” while the one below asks “Are you having an appropriate aesthetic experience?” The trade show in question was an event in 1972 at a public garden in San Diego, where an entrance fee allowed amateur photographers access to models. Lonidier’s photos range from relatively banal and serene scenes of photographers in motion, examining their cameras, and milling around the park, to stark and nefarious shots of hordes of male photographers pointing their cameras at a bikini-clad model who poses and contorts on the grass.
An ardent leftist, Lonidier got his start documenting anti-Vietnam War protests, and the camera for him has always been a mirror, or perhaps a weapon. Less in the journalistic sense of documentation and more as a means of shielding from and bouncing back the elusive energy that is power relations. His work became trickier (a satisfying knotting) as he added layers of visual remove while maintaining his pointed political analysis. Expanding beyond the photographic image, Lonidier began to use text and performance-based gestures and staged shows in specific locales outside of a gallery context, all the while continuing to document the process. The images and text in his oeuvre, as well as “Vacation Village Trade Show,” depict a meta-photographic narrative. Lonidier is bumping lenses with his subjects.
In the Benevento office, advertisements for Vivitar lenses line the walls. Lonidier has circled, in red, key phrases on the lenses’ magical powers to seduce. The red circles, paired with newspaper and magazine clippings, suggest a conspiratorial web or a journalist on the trail of evidence (are the two that different?). The tucked-away office is also where Lonidier displays photos from the trade show where he has circled cameras and branded merch from GAF, a camera manufacturer (Lonidier has also made work about GAF’s labor practices). Like in Blow Up, the printed photo becomes evidence for a crime. Instead of merely exposing the oppressive gaze of the camera lens, Lonidier traces a line between it as a commodity sold through the sexualization of women and the preternatural power it possesses to frame, cut off, or linger.
Fred Lonidier: Valley Village Trade Show
Michael Benevento
3712 Beverly Blvd.,
Los Angeles, CA 90004
On view through May 17, 2025 -
Helmut Lang’s Burdensome Bodies
The R.M. Schindler House is unexpectedly quiet. Despite being smack-dab in the middle of West Hollywood, there’s a noticeable lack of noise around the house and grounds, as if the air is somehow thick enough to deaden dog barks and car horns. The silence somehow feels borne of the house rather than its surroundings. As one of three Los Angeles headquarters for the MAK Center for Art and Architecture, the Schindler House—the namesake of architect Rudolph Schindler—feels like a break in time. A leader of Southern California Architectural Modernism, Schindler’s 1922 home is the prototype for the aesthetic that placed a high value on unusual material pairings and the dissolution of boundaries demarcating inside and outside. In the hanging silence, the smell of old wood and ripening plants easily transports you back one hundred years, but with the resurgence of mid-century architecture, the site remains tethered to the present, too. It’s the ideal site for the free-standing sculptures and wall works of Schindler’s contemporary Austrian peer, Helmut Lang.
The photos of the works in Lang’s show “What remains behind” don’t do them justice. One must see them in person. On-screen or on paper, the sculptures appear (rather unsurprisingly) stoic and imposing—cold and indifferent, even. Made of foam, shellac, latex, resin, and steel, they contrast with the house’s cement floor and wood beams, appearing somehow darker. Curator Neville Wakefield scattered the sculptures across low-slung rooms, and in the photos, the works appear to domineer the space, suggesting an impenetrable tightness within an otherwise open architecture.
But the sculptures shone bright amber when I visited in the midday sun of a Sunday in February. The six tallest works, all part of the Fist series (works in series 2015–2017), are spindly stalks with bulbous growths atop them resembling crude femurs or, as the title implies, closed hands punching through the air to the low-hung ceilings. Their latex skins gleamed as if sweating, and I half expected them to begin dripping onto the floor. The natural light cutting into the house bounced off their curves and crannies, giving their twisted forms a vitality as if muscles caught in the act of contortion, capable of twitching and rearranging at any moment. Though brighter and smaller in person—the tallest of them almost rising to meet me head-on—they retained that imposing quality, exuding a pressing unease.
The two wall pieces felt more conventional, rectangular, and neatly enclosed in steel frames. Titled kleine Portrait Arbeit I and kleine Portrait Arbeit II, respectively (the loose translation of which is “small portrait work”), the plastic, wax, and shellac pieces resemble scabs ripped from a wound, slapped onto the wall, and framed. Repulsed though I should have been, all I wanted was for my fellow visitors to clear out so I could run my hand along their uneven skins.
Helmut Lang, kleine Portrait Arbeit I, 2015–17. Courtesy of the artist and MAK Center for Art and Architecture. In a later email interview with Lang, he asked, “Is sculpture not a form of body by definition?” The answer is, of course, yes, though I’d argue to various degrees. Auguste Rodin’s The Age of Bronze (1875) is a body, and Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc (1981) is a body, but is Lang’s? These are bodies. Fractured, skinned, expelled. Those fists could be my fists; that skin could be my skin. Perhaps that’s why I find them so enticingly destabilizing: their familiarity, their proximity to my physical self. The collection is decidedly uncanny, for what is the uncanny if not the familiar made strange?
The uncanny, though, cannot be separated from trauma, a current that underlies much of Lang’s work. “At some point, human instinct overrides traumatic events and focuses on survival—not what has happened, but how to deal with it going forward,” wrote Lang in our correspondence. “It is a long journey that leaves the security of experience to create new realities.” To override trauma requires expelling oneself from certain comfort to the liminal space of frightening indefinability. It’s a violent act made visible in the two smaller sculptures, Prolapse I
and Prolapse II (each 2024). Reaching no more than three feet, they resemble rocks or, more fittingly, something you might dig out of your ear after a long time without cleaning. Unlike those in the Fist series, these pieces don’t have that iridescent sheen encasing them, which permits you to notice the texture more thoroughly, picking up on the bubbles and gaps left in their shellac coats. Like Schindler, whose architectural ethos put great emphasis on melding together the inside and outside, Lang’s Prolapse series toys with the edges of the human body and those fragile boundaries that demarcate our in and our out. The most visceral in name, the two works are manifestations of the liminal space that is “the body” and “of the body.” Left on the ground, they sit as the literal detritus of what’s been expelled, remainders of a whole that’s since moved on.Helmut Lang, prolapse I, 2024. Courtesy of the artist and MAK Center for Art and Architecture. Underlying the show is a concern with history, specifically its burden. Therefore, it seems fitting for the show to be situated in the Schindler House, a space rife with temporal significance. The objective of preserving the home is to retain a spirit of the past in the present and to provide a jumping-off point for a yet-to-be-constructed future. For Lang, “The accumulated past, consciously or unconsciously, forms the physical, emotional, and intellectual material one is today. That is the starting point for all we do going forward.” Materially, Lang often uses the discards of former projects and scraps of handed-down objects that hold a history in and of themselves. He confronts these materials without sentimentality, tackling the malleable bits of collected waste until they become his hardened fists, skins, and prolapses.
The convergence of his own unrevealed history with that of the material undoubtedly contributed to the tension I experienced while walking through the exhibition. Lang’s abject objects are the broken bodies of multiple histories made manifest. The unspoken stories embedded in the works cut through the thick silence of the house and hang in the air as ghostly presences.
-
MOURNING SICKNESS
A spate of Sad Girl art is on view in LA this spring—but is our interest in Sad Girls subversive or exploitative?Thérésa Tallien, the French Revolution’s ‘it’ girl, knew how to manipulate perception. Once an emblem of revolutionary glamour, she played the game until it turned against her. Even in captivity, awaiting execution, she refused to become a simple object of pity. The mirror sent to her cell each day wasn’t punishment; it was a tool. Stripped of adornment, starved, pale, she studied herself—not to break, but to refine the performance. When she emerged from prison—freed in part by the influence she still held—she did so as a legend, the Notre Dame de Thermidor, not just a survivor but the architect of her own spectacle.
The sad girl isn’t merely suffering; she’s a tragedy calculation—a negotiation between vulnerability and control. Contemporary Thérésa Talliens understand this too, but where her pain was instrumental, ours is a recursive, self-consuming loop. She is an embodied contradiction, unsettling rather than sympathy-seeking, forcing us to ask if vulnerability can ever be sincere in a world that feeds on it. To be a sad girl is to cultivate a wound. But is sad girl art subversive or exploitative? That binary is too neat.
Recently, I’ve been noticing a promising momentum, particularly in L.A. The era of women draping themselves in gauze, staring mournfully at the viewer, and calling it subversion—what I’d dub Francesca Woodman cosplay—is beginning to dissolve. In lieu of it, a new energy is rising: young women artists taking the fragments of that aesthetic and pushing it into raw, urgent terrain. No longer a vanishing act but an occupation.
Martyrdom isn’t inherited; it’s rehearsed. My generation of young women artists and writers has learned the performance well. Knees bruised, lips cracked, we braid each other’s hair before dawn, praying to our lace-dressed martyr, impaled on the family’s iron fence. The Virgin Suicides’ youngest Lisbon girl—caught between innocence and annihilation. We learned from the saints; ribs cracked open in ecstasy, martyrdom mistaken for holiness. We practiced in secret—pressing our fingers to candle flames, writing bad poetry in the margins of Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton. I still wake in vintage slips, lingering in the high of the aesthetic, the strap slipping from my tiny shoulder. Playing the role of the pale, femme poet in my own cinematic world. I once went by Luna (not my name), defaced library books with my poetry (sorry), wore Catholic school saddle shoes (though I didn’t go). I wanted a self-mythologizing ritual, a transformation of fragility into potential, rendering the distinction between endurance and performance irrelevant. But I no longer mistake aesthetic for intention. It’s not about discarding the performance but knowing when to break script.
Shannon Cartier Lucy, Woman in a Trench Coat, 2018. Courtesy of the artist. Shannon Cartier Lucy’s work offers a window into this realm of self-mythologizing. Her work consists mostly of paintings of figures that I would also cast as “pale, femme poets.” In the piece Woman in a Trench Coat (2018), the slender figure dressed in an immaculate white coat smiles at something out of frame. Her expression is the divine balance between absurd humor and placid derangement. However, the pivotal part is following her hands as they clasp around her throat. It reads as a solitary moment in the muted tones of a blurred-out, lush landscape with casual self-inflicted violence. Cartier Lucy’s figures do not collapse under the weight of their fragility; they shape it into something deliberate, like violence that contrasts her pristine vintage trench coat for spring. It is a sculpted aesthetic that both performs and resists commodification. But it is not just a commodification of pain; it is a ritual. Saint Teresa’s visions of ecstasy were spiritual, but they were also deeply theatrical. She staged her suffering, perfected the pose of rapture. Marking this approach to more of a tradition than a marketable trend. It is a form of belief. Not in the pain itself, necessarily, but in the way it structures identity, gives shape to the formless ache of being.
Los Angeles-based artist Shana Hoehn explores the tension between bodily destruction and transformation in her paintings and sculptures, as seen in her recent solo exhibition at Make Room this February. Her figures twist, they fold, split, and splinter; they expand into grotesque acts of self-transformation. Her consistent use of braids—common symbols of femininity across the girlhood spectrum from sister-wives of Fundamentalists to cheerleaders—morph into something even more insidious than those examples. They become their own phallic ligament, cracking like a whip, poisonous vines of nightshade constricting and consuming. Like the sad girl, they exist in a space of paradox—a familiar image warped into something dangerous and potent. Her girlhood limbs and parts are devoured by infinite orifices, the desire to eat oneself or be swallowed. They ask us to reconsider girlhood, not as something passive or innocent, but as something capable of great violence, both external and internal.
History and literature are littered with sad deities who blur the line between suffering and dominance, their actual power forged through their own undoing with a side of carnage.
Shana Hoehn, I give birth to myself, 2025. Photo: Alex Delapena. Courtesy of the artist and Make Room, Los Angeles. Perhaps in the background of Hoehn and Cartier Lucy, who challenge conventional narratives of femininity and girlhood, is Unica Zürn’s work, shaped by the fractured psyche of mid-century Europe, confronts suffering as a transformative force. Her life—marked by mental anguish, violent relationships, and a tragic end—becomes part of a larger, transcendent presence. Zürn’s self-portraits, such as Self-Portrait (1965), capture the body in states of continual metamorphosis. Rather than remaining static, her works unravel suffering, converting it into a force that reshapes identity. Pain becomes a continuous flux, an evolving process where boundaries blur and the self is perpetually remade.
Anne Carson writes of emotion as a force that moves ahead of itself—perhaps madness. But madness is not formless; it is a ritual as old as myth itself. Dionysian ecstasy, Orphic descent. Virgin Suicide. To feel is to be cast into the jagged contours of history, where suffering is spectacle. But in this situation, the storyteller holds the power. Carson’s heroines—Herakles’ wife, the girl burned into glass—are not merely figures of endurance; they become icons, their pain transforming into a legend that cannot be undone. In Hoehn’s I Give Birth to Myself (2025), the figure emerges from a tangled weave of hair shifts between confinement and release, offering no clear-cut narrative of exploitation or subversion. Hoehn’s work speaks to a rupture in the binary, where vulnerability becomes both a prison and a moment of radical emergence. Zürn’s work similarly fractures the body, not as a passive victim of history, but as a dynamic force, subject to reinvention. for both artists, suffering becomes an act of disintegration and reconstruction—history rewritten not by overcoming trauma, but by remaking the self through it.
In Cruel Optimism, scholar Lauren Berlant suggests that when suffering becomes ingrained in culture, it shifts from being personal to collective—so familiar it almost becomes aesthetic. Cartier Lucy’s Bathtime (2018) captures this with a woman submerged in water, her face buried in her hands, her black dress darkening the water around her, as if we are witnessing a casual but cursed domestic baptism. There’s no comfort, no escape—just a repetitive cycle. One set of hands rubs shampoo into her hair, another holds her down, while a third claps to the side. The violence doesn’t lie in any single act; it’s embedded in the whole, as though the entire scene is structured to contain it.
The sad girl was never just an aesthetic; she was a warning. But warnings lose their power when they become too legible, too easy to romanticize. The problem isn’t vulnerability—it’s the way vulnerability has been flattened into a currency, traded in self-conscious martyrdom. The strongest artists refuse this loop. Cartier Lucy’s women, caught between violence and banality, don’t ask for sympathy. Hoehn’s figures contort past recognition, their bodies not symbols but volatile material. Zürn unravels the self completely. These artists demonstrate that, when recontextualized, suffering is not a pitiable condition; it becomes something to fear. This is where the sad girl fractures: when she stops looking at herself in the mirror and starts clawing at the glass.
-
Alex Israel
at GagosianTo prepare for his current show “Noir” at Gagosian, Alex Israel claims to have walked about fifteen thousand steps per day around Los Angeles. This is highly unusual and, honestly, suspect. As the saying goes, no one walks in LA. Yet Israel insists on it and says that all this walking clued him into the more subtle, textured aspects of the city —things “[he] wouldn’t ever clock from the car window”—which ultimately informed his paintings.
In an attempt to better understand Israel and his work, I, too, began taking seven-mile walks around the city, daily: Van Nuys to Canoga Park, Glendale to Alhambra. El Prado to Sunset Tower. And so on and so on. I did my best to see the city as I imagined Israel would. I got into character—Alex Israel, wunderkind artist—and adopted that carefree, near-smug affect I’d seen in all of his portraits online. I did things that I thought he would do: I wore Ray Bans, smiled at nothing in particular, and listened to songs from mid-2000s iPod commercials. Slowly but surely, I started to feel cool and unhurried, the star of my own private sequel to Nic Refn’s neo-noir Drive: Walk.
Such a confident approach gave me clarity, and I realized that Israel was right. After seven miles of walking per day, you do start to notice the city’s hidden textures. Most obviously: for all their disuse (or perhaps because of it), the sidewalks are remarkably perilous, so full of fissures and crags that even a brief daydream comes at the cost of an ankle.
Alex Israel, “Noir,” installation view, 2025. Photo: Charles White. Courtesy of Gagosian. LA’s terrain, it turns out, is not easy. So, I’m surprised when I finally arrive at Israel’s “Noir” in Beverly Hills (by way of the Sherman Oaks Galleria, a four-hour walk through Benedict Canyon) to find a suite of paintings illustrating the exact opposite.
Apparently, Israel’s LA is easy. His paintings depict LA landmarks, both well and lesser-known—Chateau Marmont and the Troubadour, but also Trashy Lingerie and Hollywood Liquor—so completely awash in golden-hour purples and pinks that they’d fit neatly into one of Damien Chazelle’s La La Land dance numbers. Streets are glassy. Lights splash. Cars and people don’t exist. Notably: everything works. That is to say, as in Chazelle’s film, the city in these paintings is frozen in pure fantasy, in an artificial memory of what LA never was.
But that doesn’t mean they aren’t true.
Sure, everything here is totally contrived. Yes, the paintings were made on the Warner Bros. lot (where Israel keeps his studio), an iconic factory of cultural engineering. Yes, they were painted not by Israel himself, but by his ostensible assistant, the last remaining artist in Warner Bros.’ Scenic Art department, a place once known for painting the backdrops that manufactured cinematic reality. And yes, they’re untethered from time. Showroom, for example, depicts the Googie-style Casa de Cadillac dealership in Sherman Oaks with an Escalade dating to 2021; Gas Station shows the Beverly Hills 76 – a Mid-Century Modern wonder – with the price of a gallon at $1.59, situating it sometime around 2001 (though possibly earlier, since that specific station runs hot), yet with a pump model from 2020; and Chateau Marmont presents us with an Angelyne billboard that first appeared in the 80s, alongside an Apple ad from the mid-aughts.
Alex Israel, Troubadour, 2024. © Alex Israel. Photo: Josh White. Courtesy of Gagosian. But Israel isn’t trying to hide the artifice. He emphasizes it every step of the way – in lore, process, content and color. Some of his paintings’ dimensions are even directly proportional to cinema’s 16:9 widescreen ratio, and others to the billboards that dot the Sunset Strip, once again pointing to that which is constructed, sold, and nominally fake.
It’s precisely because these paintings are so wholly contrived that they become true. Israel leans into the city’s cliché—its fakeness, its artificiality—to highlight its depth. Vapid, you say? How about we empty it out entirely, then smooth it over and paint it like a static backdrop on a soundstage? The move is clever and conceptually sound, and it allows us to at once realize the incredible familiarity we have with our city, while also recognizing its impossibility. To live in LA is to constantly wake up from a dream you’d rather remain in. It’s not so much nostalgia as it is the stuff of romance, and of tragedy.
The paintings don’t go much further than this, and I’m not sure they have to. I could, however, stretch the show a bit further and note the fact that, at their most fundamental, these paintings are glorified depictions of LA real estate, which happens to be the source of Israel’s family fortune (his father is the developer Eddie Israel). So, while there is a base note of reverence throughout, maybe there’s also a tinge of guilt by association, of complicity. After all, these landmarks and their iconic features, not to mention the subcultures associated with them, will inevitably get lost in the very wave of real estate development that allowed Israel the opportunity to paint them in the first place. In other words, without this city, these paintings wouldn’t exist, but without these paintings, perhaps the city would.
Alex Israel: Noir
Gagosian
456 N. Camden Drive.,
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
February 6 – March 22, 2025 -
Michelle Uckotter
at Matthew BrownThere’s something in the Los Angeles air recently that’s been conjuring the ghost of Charles Manson. He has been coming up in conversation frequently (or maybe I am bringing him up). California’s back on the national stage for its hippie-turned-fascist tendencies. Utopian visions morph into murderous cults à la the Zizians. The inherent contradictions of the “Golden State” are getting blown wide open. Another possible culprit for the Manson discourse: Michelle Uckotter’s show “Moviestar” at Matthew Brown.
At the opening of “Moviestar,” everyone is asked to remove or cover their shoes before stepping on a grimy mustard yellow carpet. I get a whiff of cigarette and briefly wonder if the smell is real as I seem to be within some sort of 1970s set (crowds of people are in fact smoking inside). Sculptures of cardboard boxes with chandeliers haphazardly tumbling out are situated in the room like discarded props—and I catch a glimpse through the crowds of a striking Uckotter painting.
“Moviestar” at Matthew Brown is just one segment of Uckotter’s takeover (the darling of Frieze week!) of Los Angeles, the others being an identically titled show at Marc Selwyn and a video screening at Now Instant theater in Chinatown. Uckotter has traded in her paintings’ previous recurring attic setting for a middle-class mid-century living room, or perhaps we have simply wandered downstairs. At Matthew Brown, we are in a living room, stepping on its carpet, looking at paintings of a similarly carpeted space. What unfolds in the paintings, adapted from stills from the video, is a night gone off the rails, a crime scene, or maybe just a dark and twisted sexual fantasy. The women of “Moviestar” are in compromising positions, but whether licking a gun, tied up, or doing the tying up, they emanate a manic power.
I call them paintings because the work does contain oil paint, but Uckotter’s scenes on panel lie somewhere in between drawings and paintings. Pastel is layered atop oil paint, and scratchily articulated figures that from a distance snap together, turn into a controlled chaos of lines and scribbles close up. The oil pastel is waxy, and while matte from straight on, it catches the light when the viewer shifts angles. Paint is treated as if it’s the same substance and emerging from the same tool as the pastel. The boundaries between the two blur, distinguishable only upon careful examination. The sculptural clay-like quality of the pastel produces chalky flecks of byproduct, chunks of which appear at the edges of marks where Uckotter has pressed with great force. Like the white cap of a wave, the excess pastel reveals a turmoil and intensity.
Michelle Uckotter, The Lady with Gun, 2025. Courtesy of the artist and Matthew Brown. In The Sot (2025), a woman is splayed out, bisecting the frame, hands and feet tied, a foot pressed against her face. Her shirt has been ripped open to reveal a bare chest. This woman is playing to the camera or perhaps the camera is playing to her. Uckotter’s framing is ripe with a lustful gaze. The violence depicted isn’t quite frightening; it’s evident that this is merely a performance. These girls are “movie stars” acting as victim, killer, musician, or psycho. And I don’t know if I quite buy the verisimilitude. While denied access to any straight-on gaze, we have body language and composition to go off of. The subjects are equipped with an unnatural assuredness.
Beyond a few scratches, bodies remain intact or are mysteriously slumped over. The implication of body horror gets absorbed into the surrounding scene and furniture. The saturated red carpet furnishing the floor in the paintings bathe the room in a nefarious bloody glow. Glasses, bottles, and decanters, filled with a syrupy red wine, are strewn about. The dingy, green carpet in Dream (2025) is patterned with pink and magenta rose buds that appear like open wounds, with the surrounding carpet turning a bruised yellow and gray. In The Lady with Gun (2025), a lamp, the shade perched at an angle, drips with spots of red. The red resembles scratches on a body, though it’s questionable whether this is blood splatter or the worn-out shade’s stray threads. It’s not the only disturbed lampshade. In The Sot (2025), a fallen shade sits beside its captive companion. Both shade and figure are pink-tinged, their bodies equally exposed. At Marc Selwyn, a lamp gets its own portrait, in which it lets off a thick, snotty, chartreuse glow.
The Manson murders, the epitomic Los Angeles murder spree of the 20th century, hover over “Moviestar.” What strikes me about the similarities between “Moviestar” and the Manson murders is less visual or temporal—hippies, pig noses, drugs—and more the cinematic collapsing of truth and fiction. The phrase uttered by Hollywood elites in Tate and Polanski’s circles, “live freaky die freaky,” is apt for Uckotter’s girls.
Michelle Uckotter, Dream, 2025. Courtesy of the artist and Matthew Brown. I don’t quite know how to situate the relationship between the three parts of the show. If Matthew Brown is a bacchanal of decaying femininity, Marc Selwyn offers the grimy masculine, populated by men with sweat-clumped hair and a single female torso nude. The show at Selwyn is stripped down, having exchanged sculptural ornamentation (only a single chandelier here) for a bare-bones display. The operatic Matthew Brown presentation overshadows it, sidelining it as supporting character.
Then there’s the video. I almost didn’t want to see it lest it bring about some kind of narrative clarity. There is some amount of inevitable disappointment at getting access to the paintings’ source material. A committed period piece peppered with strategically placed anachronisms, Moviestar (the video) (2025) follows careerist artistic types encountering a psychotic hippie home invasion. The anachronisms in dialogue and dress pleasantly destabilize the precise set dressing. In the painting “The Threesome,” a man, tied up by two women, sports a knuckle tattoo that says “true.” This paradox, the untruth of a historical inaccuracy that says “true,” speaks to the intent of the project at large. It is collapsing time, fictionalizing historical events, and exposing violence’s manifestation of unconscious fantasies. Etched into these paintings is a truth of sorts.
But it’s only of sorts. What is a director/painter if not a cult leader, promising the truth while delivering an illusion. Pulling the strings, getting others to do your bidding, emotionally molding your underlings. Manic smearings elevated to godly proportions. I’ve joined the Uckotter cult.
Michelle Uckotter: Moviestar
Matthew Brown (and parallel exhibition at Marc Selwyn)
631 N. La Brea Ave.,
Los Angeles, CA 90036
February 13 – March 29, 2025