Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: Art
-
PICK OF THE WEEK: Victoria Gitman
François GhebalyA series of precious objects rendered in oil paint requires your intimate proximity. Tiny tactile paintings of levitating furs, beaded coin purses, costume jewelry and sequin fabrics depict trompe-l’oeil images of feminine objects commonly associated with glam, flamboyance, and the body. Gazing at these luscious surfaces, your eyes cannot help but indulge in the pleasure of looking, noticing the kink of every hair and the flicker of each bead.
Victoria Gitman’s exhibition “Everything is Surface” at François Ghebaly presents a survey of the Argentinian artist’s twenty-year career. Gitman’s paintings are fetishistic artifacts; the sensual and vibrational quality of each painting is achieved over the course of several months. Sourcing materials from flea markets and online shops, Gitman selects objects based on how they resonate with her personally–a collective trace of the artist’s own subjectivity. In her essay “Notes on Camp,” Susan Sontag describes the essence of camp as “esoteric–something of a private code, a badge of identity even.” The alluring and allusive quality of Gitman’s work inspires a playful desire.
Another series of paintings titled “A Beauty” features women rendered by male artists in art history, punctuating the walls as you enter and move into the second gallery. Here, Gitman offers critical art historical commentary on gendered gaze and feminine perspectives in painting (or the lack thereof). Gitman’s feminine “camp sensibility” undermines macho-modernist ideologies. The artist reminds us that feminine pleasure is a form of freedom and joy.
François Ghebaly
2245 E Washington Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90021
On view through May 7, 2022 -
Letters in Exile, No. 2
By Maria AgureevaThe soul of the arts in Russia is withering. In Ukraine it is being obliterated, literally. In this second blog, Maria is speaking to the loss of personal freedoms occurring in Russia that is deeply disturbing, and another fall out of the war. In Ukraine, the loss of life and destruction of the cultural infrastructure is of another terrible order. In the past month, Berlin has become a safe harbor for many Russian and Ukranian artists. Maria is temporarily living at UfaFabrik International Art Center. —Clayton Campbell
February 27, 2022- Maria and team work on a project that will not be released. Her team has requested their names not be used for their security and safety.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jVwEXMwL8
February 27th, 5 secondsMarch 31, 2022
Two years had passed since the start of the pandemic, and my practice and projects had been on hold. Finally, this past January I was full of hope and anticipation about new horizons; I anticipated a fresh wave of creative activity.
On March 3rd I was scheduled to open my new art work, Pulse of the Earth is Your Pulse, a collaboration with the new digital-art platform. I had spent months on my mult-disciplinary project that included performance, sound art, and a limited collection of designer clothes based on my digital designs. I realized it would be unethical to open a project in Russia during a state of war. We couldn’t maintain the illusion of normality; the world was turned upside down. When there is so much violence in the world, it’s hard to think about art.
From the project “Pulse of the earth is your pulse”. 2 minutes. Sound art Dario Duarte Nunez.
Maria’s practice proposes “an alternative scenario in which the human body will develop not in the direction of manufacturability, but in the direction of natural symbiosis, as a result of which new forms of life are synthesized – no longer a person, but not yet a plant or animal, but something borderline.” Environmental and climate change priorities have been diminished because of the war. The video of Pulse……is its first appearance in the US.
https://vimeo.com/429195488The team collaborating on Pulse of the Earth is Your Pulse assembled on February 27th. We were going to finish my project, knowing that it would not be released. I was recording a voiceover for the final interactive part. Working was the only thing that kept us from losing our minds. We were all beginning to experience real trauma in our bodies from the stress. I was shaking as I recorded a text I had written for the piece. I spoke about the unpredictability of just being, about how humanity has entered an era of complete unpredictability, how we can no longer imagine what lies ahead. I talked about how the laws of the past will no longer work in the future and some kind of global restructuring/reassembly awaits us. I wrote this text a month before the war, not imagining it was already underway.
Ukrainian-Russian artist Aljoscha art action on February 24, first day of the war:
“As an European artist of Ukrainian-Russian origin, I stood naked and unprotected as an animals and plants are in the silent protest against any kind of ideological madness. Stop insanity, seek for kindness!”Over the years artists, curators, gallery owners, and critics had painstakingly helped build an openminded cultural environment in Russia. But now, contemporary culture has been rolled back. It is devastating on so many levels. International projects are cancelled because artists cannot come to Russia. Many Russian artists have gone into exile and do not see a future for themselves where they cannot freely express their opinion.
I have been asked by my colleagues not to use in my blog their names or the name of the platform where we were going to launch my project. It is for their protection. They are all frightened and worried that any affiliation with the blog will be seen by state security and held against them, ruining their chances for future work. Some of them have left Russia, others are still there.
04/04/2022 rally at the Brandenburg Gate, Berlin, in response to the actions of the Russian army in Bucha, Ukraine. Russia is waging two wars, one on the territory of Ukraine and the second inside the country with its dissidents. Every day new laws are coming out that restrict personal freedoms. People who do not agree with them are looking for opportunities to leave Russia. This month all independent media in Russia was closed and banned. Expressing an opinion not coinciding with the policy of the authorities has become a criminal prosecution. This stressful emotional reality, which we all felt every minute with the start of the war is suffocating. It is hard to imagine that humanity can still repeat these terrible scenarios after all the historical experience that we have lived through.
I hope my journey will lead me back in Los Angeles in a few months, and then my family will start over again.
In next week’s blog I share thoughts from Ukrainian musician Alexy Karpenko and Russian artist Nikita Shokhov.
—Maria Agureeva
Editor’s Note: If you would like to donate to Ukrainian relief efforts, you may make a direct contribution to the Global Giving Ukrainian Relief Fund at this link. Or please donate to a charity of your choice that will assist the people of Ukraine.
https://www.globalgiving.org/projects/ukraine-crisis-relief-fund/
-
GALLERY ROUNDS: Museum of Art and History Lancaster
Group Exhibition “Activation”Comprising seven different exhibitions, “Activation” is an exciting series of works from six individual artists as well as a selection of activist graphics. Featured artists and their exhibitions include Mark Steven Greenfield, April Bey, Carla Jay Harris, Keith Collins, Paul Stephen Benjamin, Sergio Hernandez and the Collection of Activist Graphics from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
Taken individually and as a whole, the exhibitions offer an invigorating mix of mediums and styles. Bey’s lush The Opulent Blerd uses tactile mediums and vivid color to express power dynamics, including that of the advertising and fashion industries regarding people of color. Smart, witty and trenchant, Bey’s exquisitely constructed work is also simply beautiful.
April Bey, The Opulent Blerd Equally lovely are the gilded, fantastical images of Harris’ A Season in the Wilderness. Infused with light and a sense of magic, Harris shapes boldly hued visuals myths both mysterious and captivating. With gold leaf elements that mirror that of Byzantine icons, Greenfield’s “A Survey, 2001-2021″ creates powerful paintings that subvert negative stereotypes about Black people and culture. Like Bey and Harris, a fierceness in palette matches passion for his subjects, serving as a framework for a message of pride, hope, achievement and sacrifice.
Mark Steven Greenfield, “A Survey, 2001-2021″ , photo by Genie Davis. Collins’ incredible use of repurposed material to create tapestry is on full display with Ali, a woven miracle of second-hand fiber creating a visceral tribute to the great fighter —and first-class art. Audio and video elements are also approached as woven material, with Benjamin’s stirring Oh Say (Remix), combining iconic American imagery with voices of black artists performing The Star-Spangled Banner.
Keith Collins Ali on view at MOAH. Photo by Genie Davis. Hernandez’ collection of work is also potent, presenting satiric graphic and comic art in Chicano Time Capsule, Nelli Quitoani; a variety of graphic fine artists’ work is displayed in “What Would You Say.” These two exhibitions, while less visually galvanizing than the others on displa, nonetheless richly round out a show soaring with imagination and beauty while educating viewers and redefining its subject matter with a sense of purpose and change.
MOAH is located at 665 W Lancaster Blvd, Lancaster, open Tuesday-Sunday.
-
Letters in Exile
By Maria AgureevaSince her residency at the 18th Street Arts Center four years ago, artist Maria Agureeva has been based in Los Angeles. Born in Ukraine and attending art school in Moscow, she travels periodically to Moscow, where a gallery supports her work and various collaborative projects. All of that has now collapsed, and she has been left with nothing. Russian artists and intelligentsia have been leaving to escape the growing oppression of the Russian State. On March 8, Maria fled with her daughter while there were still several border crossings open. With the help of a small network of friends, they landed in Berlin at the UfaFabrik International Art Center. It will be just one stop on her journey going forward and returning to Los Angeles. Her story and observations, and those of other artists during this time of war, are the subject of her blog. —Clayton Campbell
Maria Agureeva, Dust, multi channel video installation, live sound art by Godtease, 58 min. Coaxial Arts Foundation, Los Angeles, 2019 March 24, 2022
I would like to start this blog from the moment I left Russia, March 8—perhaps forever—from the moment one chapter of my life ended and a new one began, where there are no plans and no understanding of what the future will be like.
I was on the verge of giving up my fleeing Russia when the Russian customs denied my invitation letter for a foreign artist residency on the Finnish border. My daughter and I went to the railway station and bought train tickets, without any guarantee that we would be let through. We were able to persuade them, because in Russia March 8 is a holiday: International Women’s Day. I will now remember that date with warmth for other reasons!
Technosphere, Supercollider Gallery x Femmebit, Spring Break Art Show, Los Angeles 2020. Curators: Richelle Gribble, Janna Avner. Artwork: Maria Agureeva, Untitled, plastic, neon, wood, synthetic fabric, mixed media, 69 x 31 x 27 inches, 2019 I have always been far from politics; I thought in other categories, which was reflected in my work. But there is now an exception. The war between the country in which I was born (Ukraine) and the country in which, despite everything, I was able to become an artist (Russia), breaks my worldview. Currently, my concern as an artist is with environmental issues and the anthropological impact on nature. Now, I understand that there are sudden events in life that change the picture of the world. I experience this consciously and with wide open eyes. When grown men compare who has the bigger dick—changing the topography of the continents—their toxic testosterone poisons everything, oozing through the pores of people on both sides of the front, releasing hatred, corrupting consciousness and nature.
The lack of freedom to think, to express one’s opinion—including in art—has led to this war. It is not a consequence of the will of one person. The majority of the Russian population consciously abandoned freedom and will. This was their choice. It was driven by State officials who competed among themselves to create laws that restricted freedom. I think of how science-fiction writers in Russia (very popular among thinking people) foreshadowed what I experience now. During the Soviet Union, the Strugatsky Brothers wrote the novel Inhabited Island. It describes a planet where a group of “fathers” rules in one of the countries. To control the population, they destroy free people while the majority of the population sings patriotic hymns. On the first day of the war, I found myself in the pages of this novel; my colleagues and I in emotional pain, and the majority of the population vehemently supporting the government’s actions.
Maria Agureeva, Berlin, March 23, 2022 We artists need to stay sober. To do this, we must look for places and opportunities to continue to work, reflect and create. We are just a part of history that always moves through cataclysms and wars. It must be condemned, it must be prevented, and it must be experienced when it is no longer possible to change. I could not work now in Russia where the war found me. Artists must continue to communicate with people like ourselves who are ready to speak up and perceive truth through the language of images and meanings.
— Maria Agureeva. http://agureeva.com
-
A Conversation with Casey Kauffmann
Hot Girl Sh*tCasey Kauffmann is a hoarder of cyber content. Her image archive is a black hole of digital debris, infinitely consuming, tearing apart, and spitting out images—a spaghettification of visual culture. Kauffmann is known for her digital collages that populate her Instagram page, @uncannysfvalley. These assemblages are strange, fragmented manipulations of a visual language that Kauffmann continuously rearranges and reimagines. A manic hyper-femininity runs through her work, combining asses, baby animals, and the latest photoshop filter to disorient and warp popular significations of women. Her digital practice also informs her drawing practice, which serves as another filter to contort and subvert constructs of femininity. I had a conversation with Kauffmann about coming of age in San Fernando Valley, the construction of identity on and offline, and the current state of digital art.
LAUREN GUILFORD: How did growing up in Los Angeles in the ’90s shape your practice?
CASEY KAUFFMANN: My dad worked for Mattel for 30 years making Barbie commercials, and my mom is a former pageant queen from the valley—I have a picture of her in the Hollywood parade wearing a fur bikini. I also have three sisters, so I grew up with a really strong femme influence. Anyone who grows up in LA—especially women and femme-identifying people—can attest to the oppressive nature of physicality, consuming images and ideas about what femininity is and should look like. Growing up, I was a huge fan of Lisa Frank, which has obviously influenced my aesthetic. All of this set me up to have a relationship to visual culture that is both celebratory and critical.
How do you view the role of the internet and technology as it relates to the construction of identity, online and offline?
I think the starting point for me is my personal history and the influence of social media and reality television. [It was] an era that didn’t just want to be in people’s living rooms; it wanted to be in their bedrooms. This idea of intimacy is a construct that is synthesized by the user. We seek out authenticity—or some idea of authenticity—and try to make that online. Can you be real in front of a camera or in the presence of being viewed? Can you access some sort of realness when you’re performing and being watched? In daily interactions, every interaction is a performance. I don’t think there is a fixed self when it comes to the formation of identity in person-to-person relationships. When the internet was developed in the ’90s, there was this utopic idea that it would be post-racial, post-gender, post–all binary constructions of identity. But there is no escaping these binary constructions when all of the options given to you are facilitated and made by a corporate structure. There’s a back and forth between us creating ourselves on the internet and the internet creating us AFK (away from keyboard).
St LILO and St Teresa, 2017, charcoal on paper Can you talk about your series, “Who is She?”
“Who is She?” started as a theory I developed for my thesis show when I was making drawings of women from reality television, popular culture and art history. I’m always interested in that crescendo of drama—the height of hysteric identifying femme emotion, and when I say that, I mean mass culture’s idea of what hysteria looks like. When I started making these drawings, I realized I could isolate that crescendo of drama and how it comes down to facial gesture—the gesture of a hand or lips, that undiluted high drama. I would crop out that part of an expression, then use the liquify filter on Photoshop, which is used to make eyes bigger, boobs bigger, waist smaller, butts bigger. I would manipulate the face to have the highest amount of drama in that digital image, then draw it, scan the drawing, then liquefy it again. It’s a kind of back-and-forth between the physical and the digital. I was also thinking about how I could bring my digital practice into my drawing practice and manipulate the image to get it to an abstracted, almost monstrous level. The title refers to the fact that these are disembodied gestures decontextualized from their source, which is often how we experience femme images online and shapes this visual lexicon of what a woman is.
There is a kind of sinister and playful tension in your work. Can you talk about the role humor plays in your art?
I consider humor to be an entryway. I’m talking about really difficult personal emotions, and when things are funny, they can access a wider group of people. The humor in my work comes from a real place of anger, anger about feeling like you’re not being listened to or understood. These things that are funny are also inherently tragic. I feel super-aligned with recent trends like Yassification and bimbo culture. Growing up watching the reality television show Simple Life and shows like that really influenced my concept of femininity. But what I love about Paris and what I love about a lot of these very front-facing iconic women is that they have to operate in this place of self-awareness. This is a kind of macro version of what women experience on a micro level all the time. All of this really defines my sense of humor. I would rather laugh than cry.
Do you keep a digital archive of the images you collect online? Do images reoccur in your work?
It’s a fucking mess. It’s my goal not to repeat images, but it has happened from time to time and, when it does, it’s super interesting. I’m not concerned about what an image means; I’m more interested in the dynamics of popular exchange that brings the image to my phone. It’s crazy when I look at collages from 2015 and see an image I used a week ago. Like, how did this cycle back through Tumblr or Instagram and arrive on my phone again? Is there any way to understand the ebb and flow of exchange? When I think about this exchange, I think about Hito Steyerl’s essay “In Defense of the Poor Image,” which has been an important text for me.
#2022sofar, 2022, iphone collage You engage somewhat disparate audiences: the art world and the many sub-worlds that populate the internet. Navigating between these worlds must be challenging, but by doing so, I think you create possibilities for new art audiences. How do you keep these audiences in mind?
It’s challenging. I would say that when I make work, I think about audience in terms of accessibility and reaching a wide variety of people. Nothing gives me more joy than a 16-year-old commenting, “This is my life!” I identify with that sophomoric soul that’s inside of all of us saying, “Not fair!” I’ve become interested in the particular things that I can consume so I don’t think as much about what other people want from me. When it comes to traversing the art world, it’s tough—because I believe that conceptually the art world really understands and appreciates my work. Galleries claim to be interested in digital art, but they are still in the object-centric mindset and don’t really know what to do with my work—which has always been a struggle for digital artists. It’s sad that digital artists kind of get left behind in lieu of people making work that is more easily monetized. I also think my work would be more palatable if it wasn’t a bunch of pornographic images of women with their pussies in mud.
You’ve mentioned your intention to create a more “democratic” art world through your digital practice. How does your work expose the limitations of the commercial art world in terms of production and circulation?
My work is democratic in that it’s funny and made of things that everyone has access to. It unintentionally exposes limitations on production and circulation—conceptually and technically—but with the intention of accessibility. You don’t have to go to a gallery or a museum to view my work, which also creates a problem because the art world functions off of scarcity. So does the NFT space despite its inception of democratization and agency for the user. My work is not scarce. I have thousands of pieces, and anyone can view them. [It] is cheap in that sense, and I love cheap things!
Cassandra (drawn 4), 2019, oil pastel on paper Can you talk about your recent NFT endeavor? How do NFTs relate to your democratic hopes for art?
I still feel hopeful about the NFT space. I know a lot of artists making conceptually rigorous work that is being sold successfully as NFTs. It’s exciting to finally have a means and an infrastructure for compensation for work in its native form. Showing my work in a VR environment is fucking awesome. It’s kind of the way my work is meant to be seen. In NFT spaces, the work goes beyond my Instagram page and operates in an archival way for these images that will eventually be lost forever due to tech changes and software updates. [It] is archiving the moments that these images are popular. I also think many people who run the NFT space are involved in too many projects to actually give the things they are involved in the proper amount of care and attention they deserve.
How do internet-oriented practices such as yours comprehend the world and the historical moment we are in?
This is a difficult time for digital practices. The internet is experiencing a kind of constant narrowing, starting as this big utopian and democratic idea and, as corporate ownership continues its stranglehold, things continually narrow. Since the pandemic, I can already see the homogenization of content through ideas of popularity and likes. I believe we’re on the precipice of a change where things are coming more from co-creative spaces like the blockchain and the metaverse where people are more interested in creating spaces together rather than interacting with things that have already been created for them, like Instagram, where you’re subject to what these white men in Silicon Valley have made for you.
-
Laurie Anderson at the Hirshhorn Museum
Unnervingly Prescient“Laurie Anderson: The Weather” at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden is the largest US exhibition of Anderson’s work to date. At 74, Anderson continues to be immensely creative as multimedia artist, performer, musician and writer—the show includes more than a dozen new works. A storyteller first and foremost, Anderson is an astute observer and interpreter, who gathers together threads of information from personal history, news reports, natural phenomena, human behavior and so on, weaving these together into simple stories, loaded with power.
One of her most potent, A Story about a Story (2015) is a stand-alone tale printed on a wall panel; it describes how Anderson, as a child of 12, broke her back while trying to perform a flip off the high diving board at a pool. She missed the water, hitting the concrete instead and was confined for several months to a hospital. The story is about how we remember things and what we choose to forget, or forget because what we went through is too traumatic to deal with. In this story of the spunky kid trying to stick out from the crowd of seven siblings by doing daring things, you can see the nascent fearless impresario who’d grow up to dazzle audiences. It’s not just a story that she buried deep within her subconscious about the horrors of the hospital ward where Anderson was kept awake at night by the screams of dying children, it’s also, in effect, Anderson’s Rosebud.
A Story about a Story on view in “Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” 2021. Photo credit: Ron Blunt. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Another anecdote from Anderson’s childhood forms the basis of The Lake (2015/2021). This time, it’s paired with a grainy black-and-white film of kids skating. The footage, projected in oval vignette form, feels antique and nostalgic. It’s blurry and indistinct like an ancient memory reeling through one’s mind. Accompanying text describes how as a young girl Anderson saved her younger twin brothers from the depths of a frozen lake. The near-tragedy is shocking. In Anderson’s telling she astringently conveys her own curiosity and mettle, her role in her family and her relationship with her mother.
It’s no wonder that words, the building blocks of the stories Anderson tells, feature prominently in her work. She loves the sound of them, their meaning and even how they look: scrawled, printed, computer generated, shredded or broken down into individual letters.
Technology is a major preoccupation. Anderson both embraces it, using all sorts of devices and experimental musical instruments in her performance work—voice filters, synthesizers, adapted violins, etc.—some of which she has invented or collaborated on. But Anderson is also wary of technology and its dehumanizing potential. Her book Scroll (2021) speaks to this. Composed of text generated by artificial intelligence using a combination of Anderson’s writings and The Bible, the end product has decipherable meaning, but is very strange and rather unsettling.
Citizens on view in “Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” 2021. Photo credit: Ron Blunt. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Habeas Corpus (2015) is certainly an important piece (and an important piece to show in Washington DC) given its focus on the injustices being perpetrated by the United States government. The piece centers on Mohammed el Gharani, who at age 14 became the youngest prisoner held without charge at Guantanamo. The original version, at the Park Avenue Armory in New York, was live and featured a two-way camera. Not only did this allow el Gharani to see the visitors and their response to him, but visitors and subject shared this intense, human, real-time event. That electrifying element is absent in this version and I didn’t like the way the oversized blocky statue distorted the film of el Gharani so he appeared deformed. It was distracting and undercut the solemnity of the work. You didn’t notice this distortion in Anderson’s similar small-scale film-sculpture hybrids and they are far more successful. The figures in these actually look like three-dimensional people in miniature. From the Air (2009) which features Anderson and her dog, Lolabelle, sitting in side-by-side armchairs is one such example. The Anderson figure describes the walk they took in California when Lolabelle first encountered large birds of prey and how the dog’s reaction echoed in her memory. Another is the mesmerizing Citizens (2021) with its bright row of individuals who stare confrontationally at the viewer while rhythmically striking a pinging knife against a whetstone.
From the Air on view in “Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” 2021. Photo credit: Ron Blunt. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Four Talks (2021) features an enormous site-specific painting of graffiti-like scrawls of text and images (all done single-handedly by Anderson in the weeks leading up to the opening) that covers the floor and four walls of a large room. The written musings of facts and sayings and the drawings have an edgy urgency; they seem to blare at you from around the room. A soundtrack plays music, nature and animal sounds and Anderson’s voice. Four sculptures are positioned around the room. These include two over-sized birds, a raven, The Witness Protection Program (2020), and an extremely talkative parrot, My Day Beats Your Year (2010/2021). There’s also a wrecked gilt canoe, To Carry Heart’s Tide (2020), over which Anderson ponders, “How can you fix something that’s really broken?”
On one wall, What Time Can Do (2021), a meditation on substitution and desire, features a shelf arrayed with fragile objects. Every now and then the recorded clackety-clack of a train going by shakes the objects on the shelf. The piece was inspired by a friend of Anderson’s who lived near the train. She had a collection of porcelain tchotchkes on a shelf and when the train went by, the shelf shook. Eventually, one by one, the precious objects were dislodged and fell to the ground. The friend would replace the broken ones with less and less valuable pieces until there was nothing on the shelf but junk.
Chalkroom on view in “Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” 2021. Photo credit: Ron Blunt. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. The sculptures add a three-dimensional element to the space, making the whole more visually interesting. They also suggest possible relationships amongst them and with the words and images of their backdrop. However, I was so astonished by the painting, it monopolized all my attention. I made a point of retracing my steps back to the hallway leading into the room where Chalkroom (2017) (a collaboration with Hsin-Chien Huang) is projected on the walls. Originally a virtual reality piece, it was reformatted because of COVID-19 restrictions. Though not as immersive as wearing VR goggles, the effect aptly simulates 3D space and is, at points, thrillingly disorienting and vertiginous. You don’t notice it during your first walk-through, but placed where it is, it’s the perfect companion to Four Talks which is visible through the doorway. Chalkroom uses the same black-and-white scrawled words and images with some notable additions: the conga line of stick figures, a tree boasting letters instead of leaves that fall to the ground as the motion of the film shifts downwards. The footage is so densely packed, it’s hard to absorb all the information, the flood of images and words, perhaps a stand-in for the assault of information we encounter in our everyday lives. It’s an odd funhouse space with long corridors, portals and opposing planes of chalkboard that fragment and fall apart. Letters float towards you like driving snow or stars streaming past a rocket ship. Your position as viewer has shifted and now you are not just observing, you are moving through it. And as you stand there looking into the other room, you have the sensation that the scrawled writing and pictures that cover the walls and floor of the Four Talks room have become animated and are streaming outwards into the hallway towards you.
Salute on view in “Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” 2021. Photo credit: Ron Blunt. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Some of the new works, though certainly stylish, don’t seem to have a lot of there, there. Salute (2021) is arresting with its scarlet flags on robotic arms that snap and scrape the floor, but even with the ominous background music and lyrics to O Superman (1981) and its reference to “electronic arms” enlarged on one wall, its seeming swipe at nationalist authoritarianism feels hollow. Likewise, Wind Book (1974/2021) with its fluttering pages manipulated by hidden fans, is pretty cool, but to what end? Neither piece has a story attached to it and perhaps this is why they seem less compelling. However, there are others that also don’t, Citizens (2021) and Sidewalk (2012), for example. But these works have such presence they don’t need a story to complete them. To be fair, Sidewalk does have a tangential relationship to A Story about a Story. The work features a long rectangular container, resembling a section of sidewalk, that’s filled with shredded pages of Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. A series of videos is projected in opposite directions on each of the rectangles that make up the “sidewalk.” The paper bits create a topographical expanse of mountains and valleys which distort the film. Much of it is indecipherable, but every now and then one can see in the flickering clips nurses, swimmers at a pool, an old farm, images that relate to Anderson’s personal history.
Sidewalk on view in “Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” 2021. Photo credit: Ron Blunt. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Included in the exhibition are a series of Anderson’s paintings. These are large, lushly painted works. Against a background of thinly applied color, Anderson places gestural swirling lines that add energy and describe an overscale item: an old work boot, an alligator, a face, a tree. Though perfectly respectable in terms of technique, the paintings are kind of meh when compared to the pizzazz and inventiveness of her multimedia work.
At times “Laurie Anderson: The Weather” seems like a retrospective. The show includes very early performance pieces, posters from her live shows, and a large selection of the musical instruments she either made herself, collaborated on, or commissioned. These are placed near the end of the exhibition, possibly to subvert the sense of linear progression, but their presence still suggests an overview of her career. Anderson has made it clear in several interviews that she didn’t want a retrospective and, looking around at “The Weather,” it’s clear she’s not done yet.
At other times, the show seems like a random collection of works. I felt I was taking a stream of consciousness walk through Anderson’s mind as she played around with ideas, but I can imagine few things more interesting and engaging. While she seems unnervingly prescient at times, I believe Anderson’s just a really good observer, who picks up on things long before the rest of us and then puts her own particular spin on them. Her observations about the world enthrall us because it’s a world we inhabit and recognize. Anderson is our guide and her person is inextricably tied to the work. To experience it is to experience her—her intelligence, her humanity, her wonder, her goodwill, her can-do attitude, her humor. A Midwestern soul sister to Harper Lee’s Scout, Anderson resembles an ageless sprite who cajoles us into consciousness with work that provokes, informs and entertains. With the Hirshhorn show, Anderson demonstrates that much like the weather, her works and the information they are based on, are arbitrary and unpredictable, and like that overarching atmospheric phenomenon, they’re also capable of buffeting us with terrific force.
“Laurie Anderson: The Weather,” curated by Marina Isgro, Robert and Arlene Kogod and Mark Beasley, at The Hirshhorn Museum, Washington D.C., runs through July 31, 2022.
-
ASK BABS
But Is It Exploitive?Dear Babs, I recently saw a gallery show where an artist staged photographs of a person experiencing extreme poverty, collaborating with them to execute the pictures. The photos were moving, but they left me feeling kinda gross. Am I guilty of unethical voyeurism? Does the artist/subject collaboration mean the work isn’t exploitive? Is it okay or even noble for artists to make work about inequalities/oppression/injustices they themselves are not experiencing?
—Confused in Artland
Dear Confused, First off, I don’t think you’re guilty of “unethical voyeurism.” It’s safe to assume you had no idea the gallery was exhibiting the photos, so you weren’t ethically bound to avoid them to align with your moral convictions. You didn’t say who the artist in question is, but to make my job easier let’s assume you’re talking about Jeff Bierk, who collaborates with his poor and unhoused friends to make popular and collectable photographs. I’m not going to make a broad statement that this sort of photography is inherently exploitive, but it certainly demands we ask important questions.
When it comes to collaborations between artist and subject, you have to ask who benefits most from the relationship. In the case of Bierk, we need to ask: Is the work truly collaborative, representing the intentions of both parties? The artist says it is, but what do his subjects/friends think? Do Bierk and his subjects/collaborators equally benefit financially, professionally, socially from the work? According to interviews, he does split profits from sales equally with his subjects, but he certainly accumulates more social capital and professional creditability from the work. Perhaps the most important question is what, if anything, does his work say about poverty today?
Is it possible for artists to make work about injustices they are not experiencing? Take Martha Rosler’s 1974–75 work, The Bowery in two inadequate descriptive systems, that juxtaposes descriptions of inebriated states with photographs of storefronts in The Bowery, an area with a long and notorious history of homelessness and criminality. But Rosler’s photos have no people in them, and the texts don’t really describe the images; the connections between the two are left up to the viewer, leaving one to question the economic, political and social forces that form these associations. It’s about urban inequality that doesn’t rely on emotional reactions to pictures of a people experiencing poverty. Is it noble? Maybe. Is it a great work of art? Absolutely.
-
GALLERY ROUNDS: Jonas Wood
David Kordansky GalleryJonas Wood’s highly patterned and flattened paintings take up all four gallery rooms at David Kordansky Gallery. Evoking the decorative arts, their inherently “attractive” quality reminds one of a painted mosaic. Wood created this affect by using deliberate linear brushstrokes atop flattened fields of opaque colors, to create a highly ornamented painted surface. The result is work that feels more along the lines of tapestry than paintings. Although the paintings are playful in character, the stylization and methodical application remove any semblance of expressivity from the paintings, leaving no room for error and nothing at stake.
As the name of the show suggests, the content of the paintings largely focuses on “Plants and Animals” inhabiting the domestic living spaces of the bourgeoisie. The point-of-view of the paintings are from inside or outside affluent architecture. The general feeling is too comfortable and well-situated to feel voyeuristic—and ends up suggesting the social status of Wood himself. Unlike the Post-Impressionist genre that the paintings are referring to through his compositions (homage to printmaking and flattened patterned brushwork à la Gaugin or Matisse), Wood’s paintings do not feel like they are painted for fellow painters, but rather for his established collectors.
Jonas Wood, Deer and Picasso, 2019, oil and acrylic on canvas Allusions to high living and designer tastes are frequently dispersed within the pictures. Privileged pastimes are hinted at, for example the painting Deer and Picasso from 2019, feature a Picasso painting on the wall, a pet deer lounging on a wicker sofa and a SURFER magazine atop a coffee table in the foreground. In the painting Patterned Interior with Mar Vista View (2020) the painted plants are ripe, alive and full with saturated colors. The mirthful pattern of the drapery and sofa create a visual kinetic energy that buzzes above the picture plane. This painting—like many others in the show—use an opened window motif; the paintings themselves are like open windows into a fabricated LA paradise, accessible only to the happy wealthy people that will in-turn own these happy expensive paintings.
Jonas Wood: Plants and Animals
January 22 – March 5, 2022
-
OUTSIDE LA: Andy Warhol
Aspen Art MuseumIt’s rare to encounter a Warhol exhibition with something genuinely new to say, but somehow Lifetimes (a co-production of Tate Modern, Museum Ludwig, Art Gallery of Ontario, and Aspen Art Museum — its only U.S. venue) accomplishes it. Thanks to both the thoughtful selection of key works and rare, germane ephemera from every stage and vector of the artist’s decades-long career, as well as the bespoke, site-responsive AAM exhibition design by artist Monica Majoli, audiences get evocative experiences along with an intimate re-education on the canon centering the artist’s biography and personal identity in the conversation.
Majoli described her approach to Andy Warhol as “both concept and a person,” and in this she succeeds, deftly weaving the range of everything we think we know into a deeper dive into his strong family ties, religious life, queer identity, restless curiosity, and prescient cultural critique. As the exhibition proceeds in a double thread of biographical chronology and episodic creativity, explicit connections are illuminated between what his life was like at key moments and the art which he produced at those times. Following a rather Proustian early-childhood period of illness, along through his lifelong closeness and artistic collaborations with his pious, part-muse mother, we see the early attempts to reconcile his working-class ethos with the modern obsession with celebrity shenanigans and the culture’s worshipful trade-in of god for glam.
Installation view, Andy Warhol: Lifetimes at Aspen Art Museum From his early life as a successful ad guy during literal Mad Men times, the show draws a straight line to later iterations of his career in which he gleefully leveraged his fame and personal brand into starring in lucrative commercial ads and even Love Boat guest spots, along the way founding of the avant-garde magazine Interview as a savvy, reverential vehicle promoting the same aesthetic that animated the paintings and films (not to mention to the epic situation with those polaroids) he was making. The post-New Wave, the expressionism-inflected explosion of gestural color, the eroticism of infinite variation, the fetish for style, the addiction to death- and doom-scrolling, and the emerging realization that every choice we make is art, as for better or worse has the power to make us special, maybe — all of this from 40 and 50 years ago will be familiar to anyone who is alive right now. But so too with his humanity, his searching, his doubts, his masks, his pranks, and his prayers.
Oxidation Painting, 1978 on view in Andy Warhol: Lifetimes at Aspen Art Museum A suite of galleries devoted to the role that his queerness played in Warhol’s personal life explicates the narrative through the lens of his choices of medium and subject, connecting sublimated political narratives with tender emotions, and continuing to inform layered understandings of the work. Both controversial and reserved, infused with illuminated relationships to art history and most importantly his own inner life, the choice to gather together these suites of frank but delicate male nude ink drawings from 1954-57 and 1977-78 with large Camouflage (1986) and Oxidation Painting (1978) canvases was inspired. It highlights the aspect of the former which overtakes a militarized pattern associated with masculinity and violence with a luscious queer palette and sparkle, and grounds the latter in the homoerotic physical, bodily process of achieving these chemical responses to AbEx — another machismo-dominated scene that needed queering.
Ladies and Gentlemen, 1974 on view in Andy Warhol: Lifetimes at Aspen Art Museum In the next room, the oft-cited Christopher Makos film Factory Diary: Andy in Drag 2 (1981) anchors a funhouse mirrored disco spaceship installation of the Ladies and Gentlemen (1974) series — portraits depicting trans folks of color, cast from bohemian theatre society and from the gay bar by the Factory. The room is both glorious and a little uncomfortable, but linking these to the film is salient, because on the one hand their juxtaposition signals a broader acceptance of gender-fluid identity, but on the other hand the portraits are themselves problematic, even exploitative. At first the infamously poorly-paid sitters were anonymous or at least unnamed publicly; subsequent scholarship revealed their identities. Questions remain, as this series can be seen as both immortalizing and erasing at the same time. The film both clarifies and complicates this equation, and in its own right serves flirtatious melancholy while evoking the years of similar films which Andy made of all who came through his doors.
Screen Test videos, 1964-66 on view in Andy Warhol: Lifetimes at Aspen Art Museum In the final set of galleries, several of the Screen Test videos (1964-66) flicker in a darkened room, hypnotic and lush; Duchamp, Hopper, Dylan, Nico, Ginsberg, and more just stare back at you with artificial but intense attention. It’s like a life flashing before the eyes of a dying man. These are projected across from a lesser-known and more final body of photo-based works with hand sewing, taking older photographs from 1976 and viscerally, visibly crafting new objects from them in 1986 — a year before his death and very much at the height of the AIDS crisis. This expression of remembering the past and giving it concrete form in a way that directly references a body in need of repair is a ritualistic act, a reach for permanence perhaps, or a look at beginnings as things everywhere were seeming to end.
Andy Warhol: Lifetimes
December 3, 2021 – March 27, 2022
All photos by Shana Nys Dambrot.
-
GALLERY ROUNDS: Ross Bleckner
Vielmetter Los AngelesRoss Bleckner’s first solo show in 25 years, “Sehnsucht” at Vielmetter Los Angeles, is a haunting meditation on longing and the cerebral process of lamenting. The 15 new pieces (created from 2019 to 2021) are fleeting in nature, chilling and deep. Mostly large in scale, the backgrounds are either black or a dark muted green.
Ross Bleckner
“Hide Inside the Flower,” 2021
Courtesy of the artist and Vielmetter Los Angeles
Photo credit: Jeff McLaneThe dark black backgrounds of the three paintings from 2021, entitled After 51 Years (I), (II) and (III), offer a stark contrast to the saturated and brightly painted flower imagery in the foreground. Similar to his famous Birds Falling of 1995, the flower imagery on the painted canvas has been blurred by dragging the paint strokes while they were still wet. This distortion of imagery make the flowers seem like they are in motion, immediately bringing forth a contemplation of the ephemeral.
There is a strong correlation in content between Bleckner’s paintings and the Dutch Vanitas paintings of the 16th and 17th century. The flowers in Bleckner’s paintings become metaphorical for the fragility of life—loss is paramount in Bleckner’s work. His skillfully applied strokes of paint are layers opacity and translucency; recognizable imagery becomes abstracted, alluding to the biomorphic shapes and other life systems.
Ross Bleckner
“Liver/Kidneys/Back/Lungs,” 2020
Courtesy of the artist and Vielmetter Los Angeles
Photo credit: Jeff McLaneIn his large 96” x 72” painting from 2020 entitled Liver/Kidneys/Back/Lungs, white skeletal shapes are embedded with flowers, suggesting death and rebirth. These shapes are interwoven on a black background—black becomes symbolic for the ultimate mystery, darkness and the unknowable. Hide Inside the Flower, is a 60” x 72” monochromatic painting of flowers painted in a dark mossy green. Reminiscent of the moss that would grow on the walls of an abandoned house or on the shore of a stagnant pond, the color itself creates an eerie silence. Like looking upwards whilst being under water, the light source in the painting is diffused and scattered.
The experience of viewing “Sehnsucht” brings about internal spiritual contemplation. It is both a lament and a celebration. Life is precious because it is momentary, and this is what is emphatically felt by looking at Bleckner’s paintings.
Ross Bleckner
“Sechsucht”
Vielmetter Los Angeles
January 15 — February 26, 2022 -
GALLERY ROUNDS: The Loft at Liz’s
Group Exhibition “A Practical Guide to Parlour Games & Magic”Dazzlingly inventive and lovingly curated by Jason Jenn and Vojislav Radovanovic, “A Practical Guide to Parlour Games & Magic” at The Loft at Liz’s, features work by Phoebe Barnum, Brad Davis, Adrienne Devine, Doug Hammett, Orit Harpaz, Jason Jenn, Ashley Kruythoff, Lena Moross, Giovanni Ortega, Vojislav Radovanovic, Nancy Kay Turner, and Sean Yang. The exhibition is filled with works that are both whimsical and richly evocative of a more spiritual world.
Among the many highlights are Barnum’s delicate, Inuit-inspired ceramic masks and vessels filling the gallery’s small side room, along with her talisman-like jewelry that includes natural stones and chandelier parts. Curator Jenn’s large mandala of gold-leaf-painted leaves, a fleeting vision captured for a few moments, is alchemic, as are Radovanovic’s untitled works from his Shooting Stars series. In both works, lustrous elements light up the walls.
Jason Jenn, a fleeting vision captured for a few moments As if placeholders for otherworldly guests, Cole’s untitled (yellow chair) acrylic on canvas painting, and her series of small ceramic chairs, appear to await visitation from fairytale figures. Suspended above and near Cole’s work, dazzlingly intricate wire and bead sculptures from DeVine, such as I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; snared but awaiting flight. Nancy Kay Turner’s The Pursuit of Shadows is an altar with individual components, a scavenged and repurposed small world which includes a Ouija board and a shoe form, seemingly indicative of a post-dystopian world, in which our present is a memory.
Adrienne DeVine, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings Adrienne Cole, untitled (yellow chair) and other works Sean Yang also has thoughtful sculptural works on display, including the trenchant When Do We Get The Seat At The Table? (cast resin, metal and mixed media.) Resin fingers strain through the surface of a chair, as if grasping an unattainable life—or, perhaps, toward a life in another or otherworld. Pure magic are the magician’s hat, bunnies, and roses presented in a variety of watercolors from Lena Moross; Kruythof’s radiant photography; Davis’ playful recombined found-object figures; Ortega’s delicate floral collage and painted works; and Harpaz’ exuberant black and white Weirdoh Birds wall covering, pillows, and prints.
This delightful exhibition is up through March 1st at The Loft at Liz, 453 S. La Brea Ave., Los Angeles.
-
Travels in the Midwest
Musing on Art and Architecture[et_pb_section admin_label=”section”] [et_pb_row admin_label=”row”] [et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text”]A couple of months ago I took short trips to Phoenix and Denver for a change of scenery, to indulge in culture, and to see the rebranding of Sheraton hotels. Denver is a surprisingly interesting city, and we stayed in the Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel, which is very well located near the main street of Denver, 16th Street, with its free streetcar, and near the Capitol with its famous “mile-high” status. Denver was founded as part of the gold rush, the one that occurred at the base of the Rocky Mountains. Historian Tom Noel has said, “Denver is such an unlikely place for a city to be. It began as a little town in the middle of nowhere, with no obvious reason to be there.” And yet it grew and thrived, building a rail connector to the Transcontinental Railroad, from Denver to Cheyenne, when that passed them by.Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel Club Lounge Today Denver is a bustling city by day, and pretty quiet by night, though one evening we passed a long row of people lined up for a concert on our way to a steak house that was packed to the gills. That steakhouse was the Guard and Grace, and the food was generous and superb. The dishes had that extra touch that makes a meal memorable, such as the asparagus topped with crabmeat—scrumptious.
Start of walking tour in Denver. Downtown Denver is relatively compact, and you can cover a lot in a walking tour, which I took from the steps of the Capitol one morning at 10 a.m. Through Denver Walking Tours, we had an excellent guide; a graduate student who gave just the right amount of information as we walked around. She introduced us to the Capitol, the State Legislature, the Denver Art Museum, the US Mint—who knew there was a mint in Denver—and we made it all the way to Union Station, which has become an eatery hub.
Designed by I.M. Pei and Associates. As an art person, I found the name-brand architecture in Denver quite fascinating. In the 1960s, I. M. Pei designed a downtown complex, which unfortunately was mostly torn down. With the exception of the Sheraton Tower, across the street from my half of the hotel, with its quite interesting façade of grids—varied just enough to relieve monotony and create interest. Also, in the 1980s, Pei and the landscape architect company of Hanna/Olin designed the 16th Street Mall corridor, and you can still see the repeat diamond pattern in the pavement, referring either to a Navajo rug or a diamondback rattlesnake. The Regional Transportation District says it spends over a million dollars a year to clean and maintain those pavers along 1.2 mile path.
Denver Art Museum tower by Gio Ponti and James Sudler Associates, behind new welcome center, completed last year (2021) Not far away is the Denver Art Museum, the only building designed by Gio Ponti in the US. Recently, it completed a major renovation, including a rehanging of the collection. I’ve always thought the building rather a fortress, but this time I appreciated how the narrow windows help protect the art, as well as afford wonderful views onto the surrounding landscape. The art is well divided on the seven levels, and I was impressed with the retelling of Latin American Art/Art of the Ancient Americans on Level 4 and Indigenous Arts of North America on Level 3. There was also an excellent temporary exhibition for those who love painting, “Whistler to Cassatt: American Painters in France” (through March 13, 2022). Yes, our well-known American-abroad artists, such as James McNeill Whistler and John Singer Sargent, are here, but the exhibition also provides some needed focus on the American women who were part of that moment—not only Mary Cassatt, but Elizabeth Nourse and Cecilia Beaux.
Painting by Elizabeth Nourse in “Whistler to Cassatt: American Painters in France” @ DAM. Sheraton Phoenix Downtown Lobby and Bar The Sheraton is having a little facelift. The revamp of the Sheraton Phoenix Downtown hotel feels very on target, dovetailing with the way we work now, on the run and in borrowed spaces. The expansive lobby is also the coffee shop (called &More) and workstation for people catching up on their laptops or having meetings I saw several meetings when I passed through—sometimes at an elevated table, sometimes in a cluster of armchairs. Then at the end of the day people were gathered for drinks and watching sports on a large monitor. Though not as spacious, the lobby of the Denver Sheraton has also been similarly updated.[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column] [/et_pb_row] [/et_pb_section]
-
GALLERY ROUNDS: Tim Hawkinson
PRJCTLATim Hawkinson is full of surprises. He is an idiosyncratic artist who is at once a master craftsman, a scientist and a tinkerer who has an amazing facility with a wide range of materials and mediums. His works are precise and cerebral, yet often about the imprecisions of the body (specifically his body) and how it relates to space. Hawkinson embraces and elaborates upon the process of creation. He has filled galleries and museums with mechanically wondrous machines that are simultaneously humorous and complex. His latest project —Drip Drawings— is a series of works on paper where black ink is applied large sheets of synthetic paper via a hand-made “contraption” Hawkinson devised for this very purpose. The machine approximates a modified tattoo gun and allows Hawkinson to control the flow of ink as documented in a short video that accompanies the exhibition. Once the process is revealed, the works become more rather than less fascinating.
The vast gallery is filled with single works, as well as grids of drawings, each with a specific pattern made from a combination of precisely spaced horizontal and vertical parallel lines. The patterns oscillate while also forming complex shapes that when presented in combinations appear to become letters or words. The pieces pay homage to Op art and share a kinship with works by Bridget Riley, Victor Vasarely and even Yayoi Kusama— artists interested in patterns and the creation of kinetic illusions. Hawkinson appears to follows suit, however his Drip Drawings are just as much about the mechanics of their making and how a succession of lines become shapes and how those shapes in turn, become complex dynamic forms. The drawings have the appearance of ruled lines, but are wavy because they are drips that rely on gravity and the smoothness of the paper surface, as well as the viscosity of the ink.
Tim Hawkinson, Valival, 2020 It is usually a somewhat futile exercise to try to reconstruct Hawkinson’s process. For example, in seemingly simpler works like Sulus (2019) and Valival (2020), it is possible to imagine Hawkinson moving from left to right across the large paper applying dripping ink lines gradually become shorter as they reach the center, then become longer again as they approach the right edge. The video depicts how Hawkinson spins the paper 90 degrees to finish the drawings and connect all the lines which then cohere into curvilinear shapes creating an illusionistic form. Similarly, when trying to reverse engineer Valival, it is possible to imagine Hawkinson gliding his machine across the surface making shorter and longer lines and then filling in the spaces with more lines that flow in a perpendicular direction.
While each individual work is a marvel to view and a puzzle to deconstruct, together (as many are hung in large grids that span the length and height of the gallery walls) the scope and complexity of Hawkinson’s endeavor becomes apparent. It is a pleasure to get lost in the lines and ponder the patterns, as well as marvel about how he created a machine that seemingly defies gravity and precisely stops ink from its inevitable cascade down the page. These works play on notions of control and reveal the endless possibilities within a fixed system.
Tim Hawkinson
Drip Drawings
PRJCTLA
November 13, 2021 – January 15, 2022
-
A Journey into the Mind of Calliope Pavlides
Pragmatic SurrealismCalliope Pavlides engineers her compositions like a to-do list, an Easter egg hunt, or survival kit. Her works on paper for an upcoming exhibition at Harkawik in New York City exist as impossible still lifes and contrary landscapes.
In the wake of a global pandemic, a climate crisis and personal micro-dramas, the Greek-born artist must “place everything on the table” and assess the damages. She works at microscopic levels, portraying a circuit of lemons pumping electricity (Citrus Circuit), or lab apparatus: magnifying glass, bulbs, prisms, circuits (There Simply aren’t Enough Colors on This Planet). Insects populate her apocalyptic scapes, which depict historic events. Shock to the System features a silhouette of the first hydrogen bomb with an illogical shadow cast over it.
Citrus Circuit, 2021, soft pastel and colored pencil on paper. In her works—both still lifes and landscapes, which are often from a birds-eye vantage point, the viewer is given an omnipresent perspective on the happenings below. Pavlides, who received her BFA in 2020 from RISD, looks to her artwork to explore a system of knowledge and faith. Her artworks are cyclical in terms of composition and matter, exploring such themes as weather, and the life cycle of insects and combustion. We all know what happens after you strike a match, as alluded to in the troubling Pyro.
She takes an allegorical interest in weather, utilizing the motif for more challenging matter. The work is mostly reactionary and explores the healing factors of making art—“therapy painting.” But Pavlides’ works are more expedient than emotional. These specific drawings follow on from her most recent series of paintings, made last year, which were shown at Monte Vista Projects in Los Angeles. “Seasons of Unraveling” follows a personal apocalypse of unexpected phenomena. Being impacted by these uncontrollable, external forces, Pavlides asks: What are the systems? Who make the systems? In an attempt to break down faith (or faithlessness) and superstition, Pavlides attempts to take control of being a victim of a series of unfortunate events.
Shock to the System, 2021, soft pastel and colored pencil on paper. One such series took place in the summer of 2021, when Calliope invited 10 guests to join her on a remote Greek island. Within days of their arrival, everyone began to test positive for COVID-19—all aside from Calliope herself. The island, which has no medical facilities, quickly turned from exotic idyll to total dystopia. After she returned to Athens the city was ablaze with a raging fire. Then there was the jellyfish sting. A few days later, her car exploded on a ferry. A mirror smashed at her feet. Her plane took off for Mexico to a Richter scale 7 earthquake. A two-week quarantine in Mexico before entering the US, an already anxiety-filled migratory trip, punctuated by a ritualistic daily rain. These instances are not traumatic nor painful, but rather consistent and relentless. Rigorous. Pavlides considers the notion of “luck” and its antithesis and the invisible forces at play—the rhythms we mistakenly inhabit and how we come to occupy them; how we escape their grip. Pavlides narrates these tragicomedies through her work.
There Simply aren’t Enough Colors on this Planet, 2021, soft pastel and colored pencil on paper. Pavlides appreciates the rules one must abide by in drawing, and notes that the setting of parameters can often open us up to surprising opportunities. It is in the tension between the tender and the technical that her work is most compelling. Her drawings seem at once satirical and analytical, depicting what can sometimes seem like nonsense with the utmost sincerity. Perhaps it is the sincerity of this work, deftly rendered with color pastels, like velvet on soft paper, that steal the show: an antidote to post-internet art, which looks instead to nature. Perhaps this is what intrigues most: a drawing of a magnifying glass or prism instead of a technical photograph. The notion feels naive, but the expression is anything but.
-
The Spiritualized Landscapes of Hung Viet Nguyen
DEVOTED TO NATURE“Art is a universal language,” Hung Viet Nguyen says. “And when I came here as an immigrant, my English language was not that great. My strength was in painting. I slowly convinced people that my art is my language.”
Nguyen came to the US from Vietnam in 1982, with a background in biology and a lifelong passion for art. After making the move, he decided to make art his livelihood as well. A course in technical drawing led to a career as an illustrator and graphic artist while raising his children and pursuing his fine art. For seven years he stopped painting to experience nature both in solitude and with his family. “I absorbed the texture and the culture that nature taught me,” he says.
Pattern, color and subject all inform Nguyen’s narrative, spiritual art, the elements of which arise entirely from the artist’s personal experience and interpretation. “Artists balance what happens to them in life with their art,” he says. “When things were all good, sunshine—normal in California—my work was darker for a while, but when the pandemic hit, and it looked so bad, spirits were so down, I made my colors brighter. I wasn’t trying to escape but to balance what my art said with what was happening in the world.”
Nguyen in his studio, photo by Genie Davis; Regardless of the palette Nguyen uses, his work is always spiritual, and devoted to nature, as he himself has been since he was a child. “That is always in my mind from a young age. I had respect for trees, rocks, plants. It’s not religious, it’s spiritual in respect to everything surrounding me—after all, they’ve all been there longer than me.”
Nguyen is currently creating his fifth series of “Sacred Landscapes,” a body of work which average approximately 50 paintings per series. He viewed the cycle of nature through four previous series, titled “Cruelly Go Round;” “Coastal Sensibilities,” which focused on the sea; “Myscape,” referring to his personal landscape; and a more abstract series, “Symphony.”
“What led me to ‘Sacred Landscapes,’ was that we live in a city. I need to live here to work, to sell. But nature is a counterbalance. When I need to, I go to the beach or the trail. I call it going to the temple. Nature to me is closer to God than [I am] in a church.” He often travels the country and abroad to experience nature, with two areas in California most special to him, the Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest near Bishop, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula near LA.
From series, “Sacred Landscape V,” #27, 11” x 14″. Inspired in part by Asian scroll paintings, highly textured, intricately detailed and visually immersive, Nguyen’s work is created by both palette knife and brush. He runs through so many palette knives that he has collected the used ones on a long chain that hangs from the ceiling of his studio. “I wear out the stainless-steel painting on canvas, that’s how much I use them. But I also use the brush when I want to create something more fluid.” He explains further, “For me the texture comes first, it’s part of my pattern. It can create anything, like a mosaic. When I am out in nature, I look, and I think, I can match that surface, I can recreate that. I think when you have a language, you have an alphabet. And with that alphabet, you can make anything, say anything, good or bad. When I am lucky, I can use my language well, and things like texture turn out as they should, smooth, or soft, or hard.”
Nguyen also sometimes incorporates actual words in his work. On his large-scale (48 x 84 inches) Sacred Landscape V, #32, his wife’s name and mother’s name are partially revealed within the grassy areas of the vast painting. “My wife understands me and lets me have the freedom to create. I also wrote in this piece ‘into nature, open out senses, feeling/seeing, gentle and dangerous magnificent, ask no more, common, extraordinary.’” The work itself is all that. To the left, a clear lake surrounded by a meadow, behind which a glacier rises, slipping into the sea; a steep, vertical volcano with hot lava still seething inside takes up the middle section; another volcano appears to have finished its act of tumultuous creation and adjoins a blissful series of waterfalls, ocean, and another lake around which two small human figures are poised under a rich burnt-orange sky. Both dream and fable, fairy tale and Adam and Eve–Biblical, this work is not just an alphabet of language but an entire novel.
From series, “Sacred Landscape V,” #36, 84” x 48″. While Nguyen doesn’t specifically see his Vietnamese heritage in his work, he realizes that “my painting looks different than Western painting in some ways,” in that he doesn’t work with perspective. “I create space that isn’t restricting. You can look down or up, as you do when you are in nature.”
Oil on panel, his large vertical work Sacred Landscapes V, #36 features a cavernous volcano, visually twinned with a cascading waterfall spilling into the sea; some smaller panel pieces such as Sacred Landscapes V, #27 feature glacial forms and sea, with the glacier cracking into the ocean; Sacred Landscapes V, #30 is a beautiful, sinuous tree. From an earlier series, Sacred Landscapes IV, #40, gives viewers a dark and transcendent night sky, with a mystical circle suspended above grey hills. In the foreground, a small figure and his horse cross this mysterious landscape.
His subjects in nature are limitless. “Nature taught me my style, which comes from a pattern,” he says. “I am just creating the language; it is a journey of discovery. I think I am going to keep painting for a very long time. I haven’t seen anything that limits me, yet. Sometimes a new element comes up, right now that has been volcanos.”
From series, “Sacred Landscape IV,” #40, 12” x 12″. On days that his studio is too hot or cold, the artist has begun doing smaller pieces in his home, using old product tins such as small metal cigar boxes. He uses both inside panels to create two separate small works that are linked together. In one such piece, Stars Grazing, a couple lie on the grass, looking up on one side. On the opposite side, a filament of stars is strung. To create these he uses pencil, ink, watercolor and varnish. “I use different kinds of varnish—some look old, with a lot of crackle in them. That is something I’m experimenting with.”
Nguyen is prolific and sells approximately 50% of his work. “When you sell, it stimulates you to work harder. Picasso once said he was a good collector of his own work,” he laughs. “It isn’t about selling for me though. I can’t control that. If I work honestly, I satisfy myself, and I believe that if you do honest work, the work will find a way to get out there. If my work is good but no one sees it, they don’t know it is there.”
See Nguyen’s work in March 2022, at the Kleefeld Contemporary Art Museum at California State University Long Beach.