Your cart is currently empty!
Tag: abstract art
-
Pick of the Week: Paco Pomet
Richard Heller Gallery“Beginnings,” the new show from Spanish artist Paco Pomet, is funny. Hard-hitting criticism, I know, but humor can be a rarity in the world of contemporary art. Most art that one could even remotely consider funny is usually of the ironic, intellectual variety, like Duchamp’s L.H.O.O.Q. or Magritte’s The Treachery Of Images. But Pomet’s oeuvre of surrealistic landscapes possesses a genuine, accessible humor that is a refreshing departure from the self-serious, incisive world of the global contemporary.
Instead of trying to explain the humor of “Beginnings” – an endeavor that is always doomed to fail – it’s best to start with the value of humor in art in general. Art can do many things, but it’s especially good at reminding us how to feel. Most often prized are the profound feelings, like sublimity and sharpness, but there is equal value in reveling in absurdity and levity. Pomet’s brilliant painting draws out the admirability of these over-looked feelings, elevating them to equal profundity.
And Pomet appears aware of this dichotomy between profound and absurd, as he borrows imagery from very profound works. In Das Erhabene Büro (2020), Pomet borrows the central figure from Casper David Friedrich’s classic Wanderer above the Sea of Fog (1818). In an example of Romantic sublimity, Friedrich’s titular wanderer stands atop a mountain, looking down towards a mist-covered valley; by contrast, Pomet’s wanderer instead looks out from his rocky perch onto a 1920s office, complete with candle-stick phones. Pomet’s office is in grey-scale, except for a sun, blazing yellow and white in an adjacent room and giving our wanderer a warm glow.
The absurdity of Das Erhabene Büro (German for “The Sublime Office”) is valuable because it encourages us to consider the very real absurdity of our lives. Be it working in a modern office or the Cold War anxiety of nuclear destruction, Pomet weaves scenes with humor and beauty that challenge the sophomoric conception of our world as a serious place. Yes, our world is a place where serious things happen, where profound feelings are felt, but it is equally a place where silly things happen, where people laugh and feel light – and both are worthy of art.
Richard Heller Gallery
2525 Michigan Ave., B-5A, Santa Monica, CA 90404
Thru May 8th, 2021 -
Pick of the Week: Anna Weyant, Alexander Tovborg, & Asuka Anastacia Ogawa
Blum & Poe[et_pb_section][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text]Belief – whether you call it religion, spirituality, or anything else – is as vital to our lives as shelter or sustenance. Myth-making is how lessons are passed down, how mysteries are explored, and how home is remembered. These functions of belief are all found in the works of Anna Weyant, Alexander Tovborg, and Asuka Anastacia Ogawa, whose works are on view in three separate shows now at Blum & Poe.
Admittedly, when I was planning this review, I was only going to write about Anna Weyant’s show “Loose Screw,” because it’s just simply that good. In terms of technical ability, Weyant’s works rival the Dutch Golden Age masters which inspire her work, and in terms of narrative, she surpasses them. Through her beautifully rendered oil portraits and still-lifes, Weyant constructs fantastical vignettes engaging with absurd and often unsettling subjects. These scenes are modern fairytales, which grapple with lessons of loneliness and pain – a woman falling down stairs, another laughing alone with her hand wrapped in bandages, and a horrid dinner of raw eggs, piranha, and impaled bread.
But while I could write a full review on Anna Weyant alone, it would be to the great disservice of the spectacular paintings and sculptures of Alexander Tovborg in his show, “Sacrificial Love.” Tovborg weaves a complex web of mythology in his show, using a dazzling array of gemlike colors to create muses, goddesses, and idols of every variety. The paintings are of an imposing size, and the figures within them emerge from their settings as if etched into rock faces. Female figures clutch instruments and are wreathed in foliage, while a few hold young girls in reimagined depictions of Virgin and Child. Tovborg invites us to reckon with our connection with history and mythology, and how the way we view the world has been informed by the stories of our past.
But while Tovborg and Weyant explore the beliefs of societies both real and imagined, Ogawa’s collection of works is far more personal. Within the brightly colored, pictorially flat paintings, Ogawa amasses figures and stories which represent her own interpretation of home and history. She wields her mixed Japanese and Brazilian heritages like twin torches, equally illuminating the canvases. The figures – mostly Black children, with almond eyes and simple clothes – participate in mysterious rituals or performances, often staring out at the viewer as though the curiosity that they inspire is mutual.
Blum & Poe
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
2727 S La Cienega Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90034
Thru May 1st, 2021 -
GALLERY ROUNDS: Stanley Whitney
Matthew Marks GalleryStanley Whitney’s first major solo exhibition in Los Angeles, “How Black is That Blue,” reads like poetry. Utilizing his consistent style of painting “top to bottom,” Whitney’s colorful square works reveal several paintings within each piece. Favoring the asymmetrical, polyrhythmic shapes that he cites in Gee’s Bend quilting, Whitney’s stacked colored rectangles are not neatly packaged. Instead they bleed, drip and scrape, squishing their neighbors and shrinking in size. It is in this sense that his 11 new paintings on view read like poetry, their lines and gestures functioning as punctuation and line breaks, each scrape or nick of exposed white canvas abundant in unspoken meaning.
Stanley Whitney, Sun Moon, 2020 While the paintings are restrained and visibly specific (they feel decidedly finished, in a way I’m not sure I am used to seeing), there is a meditative quality to them. In making these works, Whitney remarks, “When you face the canvas and you’re painting, you have to bring everything to it. […] What comes out of my growing up? What comes out of my Blackness, my maleness, just being a human being? When you’re facing a blank canvas, you need all of these things to make it something.” The result is none of these things, and yet all of them at once accumulating to posit something new, something that looks like this exhibition, where each painting feels like a meditation on being and being in the exhibition is overwhelmingly meditative.
Stanley Whitney, Memory Garden, 2020 Entering the gallery is breathtaking. Each room presents one singular painting — large and mighty in stature — on its own wall. Given ample room these paintings seem to breathe, conversing with one another, each composed of the same parts and yet strikingly different. Whitney is a master of color, evident in his bold usage. Though the paintings are made up of blues, pinks, greens, reds and everything in between, I can be sure to tell you which the “green painting” (Twenty twenty), “yellow painting” (Sun Moon) or “pink painting” (Memory Garden) is.
Though they are boldly multi-hued, as well as significantly sized, they do not appear “colorful” or oppressive but rather muted and pensive. This speaks both to Whitney’s expertise of color and also his understanding of harmony and proportion.
Stanley Whitney, “How Black is That Blue” at Matthew Marks Gallery, 2021 This genre-spanning exhibition takes its influence from many forms — Gee’s Bend quilters as previously mentioned, architecture (look closely and the paintings will start to look like buildings, smartly constructed which, when placed in the context of this exhibition exist as landscapes or cityscapes), and jazz music. The off-beat, whip-smart irregularities of jazz are mimicked in Whitney’s obscure rectangles which have most in common with Beat poets and stream of consciousness method of writing. This exhibition, which can be best described as transcendent, reconciles form and meaning and, alike poetry, surpasses language and the words that construct them.
Stanley Whitney: How Black is That Blue
February 13 – May 8 2021
Images ©Stanley Whitney, Courtesy Matthew Marks Gallery
-
Pick of the Week: Ana Serrano
Bermudez ProjectsOur city’s beauty is often overlooked. This is a subject I’ve touched on in the past, and it’s an unfair generalization that Los Angeles is an “ugly” city. Maybe it’s because our city is difficult to walk through, and so you don’t notice the beauty. Maybe it’s only ugly in comparison to the beauty of the nature surrounding it. No matter the reasoning, one thing is clear: LA has an image problem. Unlike New York or San Francisco, the neighborhoods in which the vast majority of Angelinos live are not glorified in media, if they are ever shown in the first place. This is why Ana Serrano’s show, “a sense of place,” will bring the beauty of Los Angeles to the fore and change how you see our city.
Serrano’s show is composed of cardboard, diorama sculptures of single-story, LA houses, along with a pair of cardboard trucks. The space is also adorned with LA-inspired installation pieces, like paintings of ravens and hummingbirds and paper wisteria flowers, which work to ground an atmosphere for the sculptures. It really feels as though the neighborhood surrounding the gallery has seeped within its walls.
The cardboard houses, emblematic of much of Serrano’s career, are simple at first glance, but their pastel colors entice you in like a bakery display case. And once you’ve been drawn in, the exquisite detail in the sculptures shines through. The wrought iron gates, the door ornaments, even the basement vents are expertly placed and crafted, demonstrating a real care not only for the objects themselves but for their real world analogues.
And this push for close inspection defines the show. Serrano, more than many artists, wants you to take lessons learned in her show out into the world. The real houses – often the homes of LA’s working, immigrant population, whom Serrano identifies her work with – are frequently ignored, and even maligned. So after you visit, take a few moments to walk around Los Angeles, look at the houses, and the birds, and the wisteria trees, and take in what Serrano is really trying to show us: the beauty all around.
Bermudez Projects
1225 Cypress Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90065
Thru May 15th, 2021; Tues-Sat. noon-6 pm -
GALLERY ROUNDS: Ishi Glinsky
Chris Sharp GalleryIshi Glinsky’s exhibition explores monuments of survival that honor the sacred practices of his tribe, the Tohono O’odham Nation, native to the Sonoran Desert in Arizona. Upon entering Chris Sharp Gallery I am instantly subsumed by Glinsky’s monolithically scaled leather jacket that levitates in the middle of the room. Coral vs. King Snake Jacket (2019) is colossally sublime, towering just over 10 feet tall. I feel an immediate desire to get close to the sculpture. I imagine crawling into the pocket of the worn-in jacket to discover an old receipt or a matchbox. The teeth of the zipper form interlocking arrowheads. Each crease in the leather recalls a story, a gesture, a history; each stud a piercing act of violence. As I look over each intricate detail, I notice that the jacket is adorned with an assortment of patches and pins, as leather jackets often are. Some are insignias for bands like Public Enemy and the Dead Kennedys, while others signify Native American activist groups, such as AIM (The American Indian Movement), and MMIW, stitched in black and red beads to represent missing and murdered Indigenous women. The sleeve of the jacket reads “YOSEMITE MEANS THOSE WHO KILL.” While the leather jacket’s hard exterior is a cultural symbol for rebellion, it also offers warmth and protection. Glinsky’s work embodies Indigenous history, resistance and survival.
Coral vs. King Snake Jacket, 2019 The radically oversized scale of Glinsky’s sculpture pays homage to Indigenous practices and native land that has historically been exploited and unrecognized. Western-hegemonic art history recalls monumental art by minimalist giants and land artists like Donald Judd and James Turrell, who have historically exploited stolen land, using it as a backdrop for their work. Art history works to reinforce violent colonialist narratives. We need new monuments and new storytellers. Glinsky’s sculpture acts as a counter monument that acknowledges and celebrates Indigenous people and their survival. While minimalism offers ahistorical universal ideals, Glinsky’s monument denounces dominance and claims resistance.
Coral vs. King Snake Jacket (detail), 2019 Indigenous scholar and activist Gerald Vizenor characterizes “survivance” as an active sense of native presence over absence, nihility, and victimry. Survivance carries forward Indigenous stories through collective memories and embodied practices.[1] Glinsky’s monument announces and honors Indigenous survival, demanding space for remembrance and existence.
Installation view: Friend ore Foe, 2021; Blue Rider, 2019 Chris Sharp Gallery
runs thru April 24, 2021 -
Pick of the Week: Amy Sherald
Hauser & WirthThe Impressionists, at the end of the 19th century, turned away from traditional muses and academies and became chroniclers of their contemporary era. They were described as flaneurs, self-styled spectators of modern life and people in leisure. But throughout their work – and throughout the art historical canon – there is a notable exception: people of color. Even the few that were depicted were ignored for decades, such as Edouard Manet’s Portrait of Laure, which was originally named La Négresse, a reductive title which obfuscates any true identity. This historical mistreatment is why Amy Sherald’s first solo west coast show, “The Great American Fact,” is so vital.
Sherald’s show illustrates Black Americans at leisure in Sherald’s signature style. Whether they’re posing with surfboards or leaning on bicycles, the monochromatic models exude a powerful peacefulness amid vibrant colors. Unlike some of her more famous subjects, like Michelle Obama or the late Breonna Taylor, the figures of “The Great American Fact” are intentionally ordinary. They could be anyone, a fact reinforced by their gray-scaled skin – there is not even an emphasis on the color or shade of their skin, but rather their beauty as human beings.
This is not to say that Sherald treats these people as ordinary. In As American as apple pie (2020), two figures stand in front of a ranch-style home and a vintage Cadillac. The woman wears all hot pink with a beehive haircut, the man cuts a spitting image of the iconic James Dean. It is as Americana as you could imagine, yet features two people whom America forgot – but were always there.
Sherald’s layers of nuance seemingly never end. In a portrait of a young woman entitled Hope is a thing with feathers (2020), Sherald emblazons the too frequently violent arena of a Black woman’s body with the universal symbol of peace: a dove. The relaxed repose of the model, arms loose at her side and face neutral, underscore that resilient vulnerability which is necessary for peace. To borrow from the Dickinson poem which Sherald references in the title, her work “sings the tune without words, and never stops at all.”
Hauser & Wirth
901 E 3rd Street, LA, CA, 90013
Thru June 6, 2021; Appointment Only -
OUTSIDE LA: Eric Shaw
The Hole, New YorkIn a year when art sales floundered and galleries around the world quietly scaled back their operations, the announcement from New York’s The Hole, that they were celebrating their 10th anniversary by opening a second gallery, felt like a collective sign of hope. To launch their new space, The Hole chose the same artist whose 2020 show was cut short by the pandemic: Eric Shaw. The latest exhibition, “Pure Mode,” is a sensorial feast of vivid colors and energizing patterns of 10 paintings that the artist made in the fall and winter of the pandemic.
While Los Angeles gallerygoers might not be starved for sunshine, New Yorkers have been in serious need of the brightness and excitement Shaw has provided. The new paintings are vibrating with colors and abstractions of geometric and tubular shapes. As with most of our experiences of late, the exhibition includes the standard QR code, which doesn’t take the visitor to a press release and checklist, but surprisingly opens to a nearly four-hour Spotify playlist of New Age and contemporary music the artist listens to in his studio. The auditory element takes Shaw’s paintings to a new level, bouncing the eye from color to color and shape to shape.
Eric Shaw, Brain Reality, 2021, acrylic on canvas
30 x 24 inches.A departure from the regimented timeslots we’ve all been forced to abide by over the last year, the lengthy playlist is a welcoming, unexpected invitation to actually contemplate the art. Brain Reality (2021), a gem of the show, was a perfect opportunity to do just that. One of the smallest works, Brain Reality resembles an abstract, cartoonish interpretation of neurons firing under a pair of blue headphones. The colors and music take your eye on a journey across the densely packed canvas. Known to draw first on an app, then translate the image onto the canvas, there is an edgy, digital element to Shaw’s work.
Eric Shaw, I Examine My Surroundings, 2020, acrylic on canvas
76 x 84 inches.Though most of the paintings seem large, they are modest for Shaw, made to fit The Hole’s new space. Compared to his larger paintings that create an atmospheric sense of energy with the multitude of shapes and colors, the smaller paintings pull the eye into a self-contained burst of energy. Those works that are on the larger size, like the 76 x 84”, I Examine My Surroundings (2020) are packed with movement in the rhythmically pulsating shapes.
While not as large as the original, sprawling location on Bowery, The Hole’s new Tribeca home is far from petite. Its 1,800 square feet provide ample breathing room for Shaw’s paintings. It has also housed great art and creativity before as the former studio of Scottish artist Peter Doig. There’s no doubt The Hole will continue this art historical legacy, and based on the line forming out the door just minutes after Shaw’s show opened, it seems New Yorkers agree.
All images courtesy of The Hole NYC.
-
GALLERY ROUNDS: Shockboxx Gallery
“Dude Unmute Yourself” at Shockboxx Gallery“Dude, Unmute Yourself” is a sprawling group exhibition of Shockboxx Gallery regulars that the pandemic-smart title reflects the need, particularly in these times, to speak out through art.
Mike Collins, Wake Up, Wake Up, Wake Up, 2021 A few highlights are in the backroom where Randi Matushevitz offers two innovative digital works that are conceived from her original oil paintings, transforming them into riveting motion-filled digital pieces that end as projections on the gallery wall. The most mutable, Queenie (2020) explores a wide range of human personality and emotion in a cornucopia of physical forms and shapes, including blinking eyes and mouth movements.
Randi Matushevitz, Queenie, 2020 Another backroom standout is Drica Lobo’s painting with a fresh, vibrant take on a beachscape in the spare Bright Future (2021) with its striped reflective rainbows in the water beneath Hermosa Beach Pier.
Aimee Mandala, Yellow Is My Favorite Color, 2021 Aimee Mandala’s, Yellow is My Favorite Color (2021) presents a charcoal-gray landscape dazzled by the glowing light of windows within a remote, mysterious home. It works well beside a range of abstract, primarily gold works from Amrta, such as her erupting gold cracks in Kintsugi, (2020) and the cascading, dancing gold of Falling Together (2020) which recalls the stippling of sunlight through trees on a forest floor.
Krista Wright, Your internet connection is unstable, 2021 Krista Wright’s representational work has a powerful surrealist painterly edge in her unique approach to watercolor and gauche painting with a muted pastel palette of greens and purples. The large canvas, nearly 3 x 4 feet is humorously titled Your internet connection is unstable (2021). This Bay Area–based artist is one to keep an eye on.
Shockboxx Gallery
636 Cypress Ave
Hermosa Beach, CA
runs through April 17 -
Pick of the Week: Patrick Wilson
Vielmetter Los Angeles[et_pb_section][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text]There’s no such thing as an alright abstract painting. They fall, without exception, into two categories: great and garbage. And for whoever’s looked at an abstract artwork, smugly harrumphed and muttered, “I could do that,” I’d point to any of the works hanging in Patrick Wilson’s “Keeping Time,” and ask, “Could you really?”
Abstraction is difficult enough to get right, but hard-edged, color-field abstraction? Doubly so. There’s a reason why the critic Clement Greenberg, by the late 1950s, had more or less eschewed the works of the “action” painters like Jackson Pollock in favor of color-field abstraction (what Greenberg called “post-painterly abstraction.”) Color-field abstractions, like the works of Patrick Wilson, boom or bust on the artist’s ability to convey through color and balance alone.
In this regard, “Keeping Time” is a stroke of mastery. Wilson’s frame within frame style always manages to keep you on your toes as the works, never culminating, constantly build and subtract within themselves. We can see this effect in a work titled Afternoon Breeze (2020). A patch of blue, in one place vibrant, melts into the red background with a mild transparency, and is harshly bisected by a think pink frame. Nearby, a pink and orange frame overlaps a field of subtly gradating maroon and sienna, capturing on one end a shred of the hot pink background. Finally, the offset canvases abutting at a hard right angle throw the entire work into a rectilinear staccato.
But the peak of the exhibition lies at the end of the gallery, with a work titled Night Bloom (2020). Here, Wilson does it all. While the blocks of color – pink, lilac, sky blue, maroon, merlot, etc. – form a brilliant and vivid cascade, the triumph is in the detailing. All throughout the painting, Wilson uses millimeter thick lines to create boundary after boundary, stacking them one atop another, obscuring some with the fields of color and cutting straight across others with reckless abandon. But still, it all stays within the canvas. That final boundary remains unchallenged, and everything you need to see is within it.
“Keeping Time”, on view at Vielmetter Los Angeles until April 24th, is a high-wire act – and Patrick Wilson doesn’t stumble.
Vielmetter Los Angeles
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
1700 S Santa Fe Ave #101, LA, CA, 90021
Thru Apr. 24, 2021; Appointment Only -
GALLERY ROUNDS: Brenna Youngblood, “The LIGHT and the DARK”
Roberts ProjectsHow we balance our individual experiences within the larger scope of our lives in many ways determines who we are, and how we understand and relate to the world around us. Reflecting on the dense and often traumatic events of the past year, which included a global pandemic and a re-awakening to racial injustice, Brenna Youngblood, in her inaugural exhibition at Roberts Projects, mediates her personal associations to these very public events as all of the works in the exhibition comprise a space for both reflection and determined response.
Brenna Youngblood, INCARCERATION, 2020, Mixed media on canvas, 69.75 x 40 in; Courtesy of the artist and Roberts Projects, Los Angeles, California; Photo Alan Shaffer Blurring the boundaries between figuration and abstraction, and speaking directly to the title of the exhibition as a whole “The LIGHT and the DARK,” i.e., the balance between light and dark, works like INCARCERATION (2020), imply human culpability through the empty hull of a black-and-white striped sweater, the pattern of which is reminiscent of prison uniforms that date back to the 1820s. In this system, prisoners had to remain silent, walk in “lock step” and wore the distinguishing black-and-white stripes, which were meant to suggest the prison bars they lived behind. In Youngblood’s rendition of mixed media, the sweater appears to be trapped within its own incessantly theatricalized and poignant gestural sweep across the canvas, and yet it also appears strangely frozen in space, which further suggests the idea of opposites, of balancing the light with the dark, the good with the bad, the pain with the rapture. The fact the price tag dangles from the bottom left of the frame in a gesture reminiscent of Rauschenberg’s dirty pillow in his seminal work Canyon (1959), further aligns the idea of prejudice and injustice with commerce.
Brenna Youngblood, Hourglass, 2021, Mixed media on canvas, 72 x 60 x 1.5 in (182.9 x 152.4 x 3.8 cm); Courtesy of the artist and Roberts Projects, Los Angeles, California; Photo Alan Shaffer Youngblood’s use of everyday materials including a pair of her own worn out shoes and an assortment of colorful buttons constitute a grouping of assembled collage works that allow her to imagine a new-fangled topographical facade which she then enhances through a variety of processes including thick impastos, transparent washes and variously loose and smooth brushstrokes. Hourglass (2021) employs hundreds of black buttons pushed to the very top of the picture plane like small circular creatures, jostling each other to and fro and desperately trying to come up for air. Metaphorically, this work specifically speaks to notions of disparity, prejudice and social inequality, and one has the sense that these buttons would rather be anywhere else than variously collected in this tightly claustrophobic mélange of darkness. A strange and hapless cloud floats beneath them, and one can’t be sure if the buttons are trying to escape it or seeking reentry.
Brenna Youngblood: The LIGHT and the DARK
March 20-May 15
Roberts Projects -
Remarks on Color: Boorish Beige
April’s HueIt’s true. Boorish Beige is quite ubiquitous with not much to say and one hell of a tan. He holds a monopoly on wall space in all the commercial buildings downtown and in many of the drab and dreary houses in the suburbs.
It doesn’t seem to matter which country you are visiting, as every room in every hotel is decked out in Boorish Beige décor from the vintage French damasks of Pierre Rousseau to more provincial motifs – everywhere you look an onslaught of BEIGE like weak coffee or dirty hair. Beige insinuates himself into people’s lives like a sour, but necessary odor; At some point, Boorish Beige constitutes the backdrop of every human life — wall to wall in kitchens, bedrooms, bathrooms and attics across the globe. He famously once proclaimed that only HE could be everything to everyone, a color to fall into, the blasé background from which beautiful dreams are born, forever proposing the endless and empty narrative of desire, bloodless and long out of touch.
Like Zelig, Boorish Beige was there when Alexander the Great carved his silhouette with a rusty blade into the arm of his lover Hephaestion in a dimly lit tent somewhere in the center of Mesopotamia; Beige was the fabric in the coffin of Abraham Lincoln’s favorite son, Willy, the day he was laid to rest; Beige was present in the dense and richly foliated tapestries at Versailles in the early morning of October 6, 1789 when the poor stormed the palace in search of justice and a heel of stale bread. Boorish Beige were the walls of Hitler’s bunker and the sheets on Marilyn Monroe’s bed at 12305 Fifth Helena Drive that day in 1962 when poor Eunice Murray found her cold.
Boorish Beige is by all accounts a self-proclaimed wallflower, punctual and pragmatic, believing it’s better to blend in than to appear too overt, yet do not be deceived! Though you would not know it to look at him, Beige has a secret and deeply satisfying penchant for TROUBLE.
Helen Chung, “Beth,” 2020 John Sonsini, “Rene,” 2015 Enrique Martínez Celaya, “The Sigh,” 2015 Pedro Alvarez Castello, “The Spanish Artist, Radical Version,” 2001 Tatiana Trouvé, “Tracing Studies,” 2015 Giorgio Morandi, “Still Life,” 1946 Charles Garabedian, “Jean Harlow,” 1964 Sophie Calle, “Dumped in August,” 2018 Bri Williams, “Sword in Stone,” 2018 Ser Serpas, “pay to cum (what I thought),” 2017 Diamond Stingily, “Elephant Memory,” 2017 -
Pick of the Week: Heather Day
Diane Rosenstein GalleryYou never really know which exhibition is going to make you cry. I certainly didn’t expect it to happen at Heather Day’s “Ricochet” at the Diane Rosenstein Gallery. None of the work was particularly sad and I actually had low expectations based on what I saw online. I remember I had even bemoaned to my editor; would this show just be another contemporary artist pining after AbEx?
Yet from The Persistence of Memory to Fever Dream, I could tell that Day was not pining after anything. Instead, she had cracked open the very center of her mind and laid it out on canvas for us all to see. Her works are free and expressive, with large fields of flooded pigment acting as the backdrop for floating ribbons of paint. They are chaotic and improvisational reflections of her inner world—her “mind maps,” as Day calls them.
And like any good map, they are also well-planned. Every stroke of paint falls just so, every flood of pigment only extends so far. These discrete elements work in harmony like dancers in perfect choreography; responding to one another, forming and disintegrating, flowing around each and every line.
These two poles of Day’s work—deliberate planning and improvisational chaos—do not necessarily explain my strong emotional reaction to her work. I’ve had a lot of difficulty putting my reaction into words, but I can share these few connections I forged in the hope that you’ll forge them too.
Day’s paintings show the entire spectrum of universal experience. They are fetuses forming in the womb; stars collapsing in on themselves. They are embryonic, and they are nebulous. I cried while walking through “Ricochet” because I was looking at art which so strongly reminded me of the beautiful, mystical and sometimes terrifying knowledge that I am alive.
I can’t promise you’ll have the same experience as me, nor can I promise that you won’t cry, but I can promise you that “Ricochet” will still be rebounding in your mind for days and days.
Diane Rosenstein Gallery
831 N. Highland Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90038
Show runs through Oct 24th
Appointment Only — No Walk-Ins -
Andra Ursuta
Death becomes her, there really is no better way to describe Andra Ursuta’s first solo show in the US.
Ursuta’s work has been dark, conceptual, sexually-charged and fueled by a death obsession; now fear is the impetus for creating a fictional graveyard in the Hammer Museum’s project space. Terrified to enter an actual cemetery, this is the second imagined version Ursuta has manifested. The first, a commissioned work for Frieze NYC 2013, depicted geometric grave markers installed on the lawn outside the art fair village, an abstracted location where forgotten art goes to die.
While the Hammer Projects exhibition initially feels like a misuse of space to the point of being uncomfortable, this component ultimately makes Ursuta’s exhibition conceptually successful. Eleven precarious floor works, each a mock tombstone with a sculptural representation of its shadow, renders it nearly impossible to navigate one’s way through the works without feeling on the verge of an anxiety episode. A singular object without a shadow is a tall white obelisk, a monochromatic monument rising above the chaos. Ursuta’s perverse sense of humor cuts through the noticeable tension with titles such as Future Husbands, In Some War and 1957-Cancer (all works 2014).
Andra Ursuta, “In Some War”, 2014. Courtesy the artist and Ramiken Crucible, New York. The sculptures are dichotomies of painstakingly finished headstones styled like striking minimalist sculptures, paired with loose and fast shadow sections—many with the feeling of a violent AbEx painting. If painting were truly dead, this alludes to a sculptural resurrection. They are two-tiered psychological objects, the vertical representing a form made with careful planning, calculated mold-making, and utter control in execution; the horizontal embraces the loss of that control. It is an emotional style of creation, which seizes the moment, the trauma, the unspeakable feelings. Jesting with traditional sculptural aesthetics, the base becomes integral to the emotional content and structural integrity of the work.
Andra Ursuta, “Future Husbands”, 2014. Courtesy the artist and Ramiken Crucible, New York. The physicality of materials is evident in subsequent layers cast to build this mass of shadows. The objects take on the feel of excavated terra firma, in a painterly and metaphorical way echoing Nobuo Sekine’s Phase-Mother Earth (1968), where stratums of earth were transposed from the ground. Several shadows in Ursuta’s work include buried consumer elements such as fluorescently-colored Nike’s. These found objects are obscured beneath layers of fecal-colored material, visible as negative space or implied caverns that can be seen in the cross section of the shadow’s edge. While evoking historic John Miller brown paintings, the shadow allows the viewer a glimpse behind the curtain. John Miller’s Untitled (1990) even exists within proximity, a part of the Hammer’s simultaneous “Take It or Leave It” exhibit. Could this be a subtle comment on her predecessors’ institutional critique?
In the end, simple aesthetic beauty does not define an artwork as good or bad. Andra Ursuta’s exhibition, while successful, walks a fine line between simple minimalist forms, repulsive references, and the creation of a general sense of unease. Ursuta effectively takes us to the dark reaches of her mind; luckily, we don’t have to stay too long.
Andra Ursuta, “1957 – Cancer”, 2014. Courtesy the artist and Ramiken Crucible, New York. -
GET THEE TO THE GETTY
Jackson Pollock, Mural, 1943 I am so glad I made sure to see the just-visiting Jackson Pollock painting at the Getty before it leaves this weekend—I did procrastinate a little. The painting, Mural (1943) has been at the Getty for an extended facelift. It’s now beautifully restored and has been on display in all its glory from early March, ending this Sunday, June 1. And that’s why I’m writing at this time and need to tell you:
GO SEE THE JACKSON POLLOCK AT THE GETTY… RIGHT NOW!
If you don’t, you will miss it. I mean, do you think you’ll be passing through Iowa City any time soon? I actually had a legitimate reason to visit, and still didn’t go. (My husband stayed near Iowa City for six weeks for a book project).
Mural permanently resides at the University of Iowa Museum of Art. It is one of Pollock’s most famous paintings; Peggy Guggenheim commissioned it and hung it in the foyer of her Manhattan apartment (yes, the same place where Pollock pissed in the fireplace).
But nevermind that.
Detail, left side When I look at a Pollock, I am pretty much in awe. To tell you the truth, in the proper circumstances, I can damn near have a religious experience with a Pollock painting. So I should tell you upfront, I’m a little partial.
The thing about a Pollock is you can feel him when you look at his paintings. But there are ones that stand out, and Mural is one of those. Could it be the size?—it is the largest painting of Pollock’s (nearly 8 x 20 feet)—but it’s not just that. There’s no denying its formidableness, but to me, that’s merely a coincidence. It is truly magnificent, but that’s not the reason for its sublimeness.
Detail, middle section When you see it for the first time, as I did today, it is breathtaking. Just gorgeous. This is painting. Everything perfectly placed. Every swirl strategically slathered. Every brushstroke brilliantly stroked.
The myth is Pollock painted Mural in one night. There are many accounts that refute this, but just as many that do not. As a former serious painter, in my opinion, it’s the latter.
Detail, right side It doesn’t stop, it doesn’t start—it just goes. Frenzied energy that go go goes. Black long smears tear through reds, yellows and blues. It laughs, it cries, it sneers at you. It stands boldly and confronts you. It demands your attention.
Mural reminds us what a painting can do and why we care that there is art in the world. Jackson Pollock was a masterful painter, a pioneer of his era. When you see this masterpiece, the painting that nearly falls off the easel (it is most likely one of his last paintings to be painted vertically), you just might nearly fall to your knees.
Image courtesy: University of Iowa Museum of Art, Gift of Peggy Guggenheim, 1959.6Reproduced with permission from The University of IowaThe Getty Center
1200 Getty Center Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90049
www.getty.edu
-
“Colorimetry”
Small municipal museums are hard pressed to coordinate their programming into coherent wholes; if a local museum doesn’t fill its walls with a single exhibition, its variety of shows comprise confusing, sometimes clangorous gallimaufries. Lancaster’s MOAH has devised an at-least partial solution: schedule a raft of solos, all of which address a particular artistic topic or circumstance. This approach dedicates the entire museum to a theme, one loose enough to allow disparate artists to enjoy exhibitions distinct from one another’s but tight enough to allow a contemporary topic to emerge slowly, surely and substantially.
“Colorimetry” is the latest and perhaps most focused of MOAH’s solo stack-ups, bringing together bodies of work—or installations, or something of both—by regional artists who share an interest in “the physical intensity of colors.” Some of the artists included under this unusual rubric regard color as a symptom of light, while others employ it as a challenge and/or thrill for the eye, while still others regard it as a thing unto itself, a fundamental yet changeable, even malleable phenomenon. Several of Karl Benjamin’s geometric paintings grace the entry atrium, heralding the orgy of color within and honoring the much-revered painter and educator as a passed paterfamilias to Southern California’s current chromophiles. The other Colorimetrists all work in Karl Benjamin’s aura, but their displays speak, even sing to one another, the voices—styles and sensibilities—discrete but harmonious.
Ruth Pastine, Blue Orange 9-S4848 (Yellow Orange), Interplay Series, 2013. Ruth Pastine enjoys the largest show, “Attraction 1993-2013,” something of a survey going back to when she was still working in her native New York. Pastine’s paintings, invariably luminous expanses of exquisitely modulated hue, have undergone a gradual evolution, moving from near monochrome to a more elaborate formulation in which color gradations suggest a profound depth of field as they organize into modulated, gateway-like structures. Although “Attraction” reveals Pastine’s formal development, it does not trace it; indeed, it is organized so as to afford her ongoing treatment of color its maximum breadth. Paintings from the same period are grouped in sometimes-dramatic installations, exploiting the vertical expanse of MOAH’s Main Gallery by “climbing” the walls. You would think such salon-hanging-on-steroids would seriously compromise one’s comprehension of Pastine’s painting, but to the contrary: not overdone, it allows her art a surprising, illumining proximity, to itself and to the others’ color work in the second-floor galleries.
Those upper galleries feature a version of the Chromasonic Field Blue/Green installation—blue-neon planks arrayed with speakers, issuing sounds related to the neon’s wavelengths—that Johannes Girardoni originally presented in Culver City last summer; a large, floor-mounted version of Gisela Colon’s blobby, luminous, shine-from-within “Glo-Pods” (2013); several “Roundels” (2013)—bowed metallic tondos on which John Eden has painted abstract heraldries, derived from the symbolic use of color that various countries have used to identify their military aircraft; and, most beguiling of all, a wall-size projection of slowly shifting color shards concocted by Dion Johnson specifically for MOAH, a delicious, languorous swim in color reminiscent of Thomas Wilfred’s pre-war “Lumia” suites. Downstairs, another darkened room hosts several large panes of softly lit color, reconstructions of the windows and doorway Philip K. Smith III had originally installed in November 2013 in a renovated shack in the Mojave Desert.
Gisela Colon, Glo Pod, Iridescent Pink Orange, 2014. -
Elizabeth Mccord
Elizabeth McCord’s Big Pink (1951) was the only painting featured in LACMA’s Pacific Standard Time exhibition “Living in a Modern Way,” a sweeping survey of mid-century design. The painting jogged old-timers’ memories and tantalized a younger audience. A recent two-part show at See Line Gallery of works from the late artist’s estate filled out McCord’s artistic history, substantially, respectably, and sometimes impressively.
Nothing in the See Line exhibition(s) rivaled the architectural profundity or even physical breadth of Big Pink; the panels and canvases displayed are mostly easel-size or smaller and veer away from the hard-edged prescience of the 4-foot-long work. Still, her later, more intimate paintings manifest McCord’s eye no less assertively.
McCord (1914–2008), who had studied in Depression-era Chicago, developed her abstract style there and brought it with her to Los Angeles at the end of the war. Despite her involvement with design innovation in Los Angeles, with its reliance on sharp edges and bright colors, she got more and more painterly as she went along. Save for a painting here and there (notably the architectonic “Lintel” series from the later ’70s), the exhibited works are composed of relatively eccentric elements—skewed, irregularly contoured rectangles of various sizes and colors piled together like bricks, as in various acrylics from the ’70s, or set afloat in less colorful, less distinctly articulated fields of such forms, as in many of the ’80s canvases. McCord’s works from the early-to-mid ’60s, in fact, are downright abstract-expressionistic.
Throughout the decades of work presented at See Line, McCord seems to have been responding less to architectural models and more to the image of the landscape. Even when her forms lock themselves most securely into place on the picture plane (as in those “Lintel”-series paintings), they convey more a sense of portal—of frame-within-a-frame views of indistinct but strongly implied natural space—than they do of architecture per se. The palette McCord maintained throughout her career, brimming with dark tones but bright chromas, seems deliberately designed to convey a sense of light and atmosphere, most specifically that of Southern California’s Mediterranean climate.
McCord, finally, was a colorist before she was a composer: given their atmospheric nuance, most of her works are pictorial, not just formal. She toned her pictures more than she built them. But build them she did, whether rigidly or eccentrically, and her exercises in sensuous or subdued palette all have a compositional soundness to them. McCord practiced a kind of abstraction found all over America, and arguably Europe, in the 1960s—one fusing the brio of gestural abstraction with the luminous qualities and almost heraldic designs of hard-edge painting.
McCord’s particular take on such “concrete expressionism” (to revive a term coined at the time by Irving Sandler) was sprightly and distinctive. At the scale presented in this small retrospective of small paintings, it seemed modest and often restrained—a muscular, if charming, style subject to domestication. The works of the ’80s begin to unlock the scope of her vision. Or are there bigger paintings of McCord’s out there?